TET-1 (Technology Experiment Carrier-1)
TET-1 (Technologie Erprobungs Träger-1) is a German technology demonstration microsatellite of DLR (German Aerospace Center) within its OOV (On-Orbit Verification) program. Project funding is provided by the German Ministry for Economics and Technology (Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Technologie). The overall objective is to provide industry and research institutes with adequate means for the in-flight validation of space technology. Certain programmatic rules were established for the space segment and the ground segment to realize TET-1 as a low-cost mission within a relatively short timeframe under the leadership of an industrial space company as prime contractor. 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7)
Flight opportunities for technology demonstration and verification should ideally be provided on a regular basis in a cost efficient and safe manner. A market survey of German industries’ and institutes’ technologies has shown that about 75% of the experiments can be verified using a microsatellite.
The OOV-Program is thus structured into two main parts with respect to the flight opportunities offered. The first comprises the microsatellites TET with a planned flight opportunity every two years. For payloads which do not fit on TET microsatellite concept, DLR will cooperate with national and international partners to provide flight opportunities on other carriers. 8) 9)
Figure 1: TET-1 spacecraft: launch configuration (left), deployed without MLI (right), image credit: Kayser-Threde
Table 1: Summary of TET-1 main mission requirements of the bus
The small satellites in this series are largely based on the flight-proven BIRD (Bi-Spectral Infra-Red Detection) spacecraft bus launched in 2001. At a size of about 65 cm x 55 cm x 88 cm and a total mass of ~ 120 kg, the TET spacecraft can handle a payload of up to 50 kg in an envelope of 460 mm x 460 mm x 428 mm (Figure 2).
In July 2008, DLR awarded the prime contract to Kayser-Threde GmbH of Munich (a company of OHB-System, Bremen) for the space and ground segment as well as for the launch services of TET-1. The microsatellite bus was designed and developed at AstroFein (Astro- und Feinwerktechnik Adlershof GmbH), Berlin in a subcontract to Kayser-Threde.
The modular multimission spacecraft bus consists of three segments: service, electronics, and payload. In the Service Segment a battery, reaction wheels, the PCU (Power Control Unit) and laser gyro are installed. The Electronics Segment contains the SBC (Satellite Bus Computer) and the payload supply system. In the Payload Segment are the experiments and also satellite bus components (star sensors, magnetic field sensors and antennas (low-gain and GPS). 10) 11) 12) 13) 14) 15) 16)
Figure 2: The envelope of the generic TET spacecraft bus with the empty payload segment on top (image credit: AstroFein)
A special point in the design of the satellite bus was the interface between satellite bus and payload. To support different kinds of missions, the system contains the nominal satellite bus and a PSS (Payload Supply System). This payload supply system is on its payload interface side adaptable to the data (SpaceWire, RS422/485, CAN-Bus, etc.) and power interface requirements, data storage requirements and payload control requirements.
The nominal satellite bus will remain unchanged for different missions, but of course can be adapted in parts, like an upgrade to X-band system if higher data rates are required. The PCBs (Printed Circuit Boards) of the PSS will be adapted for every new payload accommodation.
Figure 3: Accommodation of the TET spacecraft bus and several S/C and payload components (image credit: AstroFein)
Figure 4: Top view of Electronics Segment with attached Service Segment (image credit: AstroFein)
The Service Segment contains the PCU, two IMUs, four reaction wheels and two battery stacks. The Electronics Segment comprises the PSS (Payload Support System), the SBC (Spacecraft Bus Computer), the PDU (Power Distribution Unit), data processing boards of the redundant sun sensor system, the redundant GPS and the driver electronics of the redundant magnetic coil system. All of these components of the Electronics Segment are designed as PCBs in Europe Card size (160 mm x 100 mm, max. 15 PCBs for PSS and 15 PCBs for the satellite bus components) and are connected via two backplanes. Additional to that the complete TM/TC hardware is integrated into the Electronics Segment, except the two low gain antennas (for omni-directional communication).
The PSS (Payload Support System) provides the control function and physical interface between the spacecraft bus and the experiments. The PSS consists of three elements which are realized on PCBs (Printed Circuit Board) connected to the backplane:
1) The power supplies responsible for the supply of the experiments and the PSS itself
2) The processor boards that are used to control all PSS activities
3) The I/O boards that provide the interfaces to the experiments.
The functions provided by the software executed on the PSS processor cover the following tasks:
- Control of experiments with minimal built-in processing logic
- Acquisition of housekeeping data of the experiments and the PSS itself
- Acquisition of measurement data of the experiments
- Temporary storage of all acquired measurement and housekeeping data
- Formatting and packaging of data according CCSDS for downlink
- Reception and execution of commands from the spacecraft bus controller
- Control of PSS devices as switches, circuit breakers, etc.
- Management of thermal control of experiments and PSS
- Boot, self-test and software update management
- Failure detection, isolation and recovery, redundancy management.
AOCS (Attitude and Orbit Control Subsystem): The AOCS uses a redundant set of star sensors, gyroscopes, magnetometers, and sun sensors for attitude sensing. Actuation is provided by 4 reaction wheels and a magnetic coil system. The main design driving requirements for the fault-tolerant AOCS are: 17) 18) 19) 20)
- Attitude determination <0.5 arcmin
- Attitude control < 5 arcmin
- Pointing stability < 2 arcmin/s
- Position determination < 150 m
- Single failure tolerance at component level
- 21h RAAN (Right Ascension of the Ascending Node) sun synchronous orbit.
The main torque actuators of TET-1 are four precise RWs (Reaction Wheels) in hot redundant tetrahedron configuration. This redundant configuration allows the RWs to work in lower rpm level which leads to less mechanical abrasion. The three internally redundant MCSs (Magnetic Coil Systems) are drivable independently from each other. 21) 22)
Figure 5: Overview of the AOCS elements of TET-1 (image credit: DLR)
All sensors for attitude and orbit determination are available as redundant systems as well. The ASC (Autonomous Stellar Compass) of DTU is the primary sensor for precise attitude determination (< 24 arcsec) and comprises a cold redundant DPU and two switchable CHUs. The CHUs boresight axes are tilted 70º away from each other to avoid simultaneous sun, moon or earth blinding. - The CSS (Coarse Sun Sensor) system consists of four internally redundant analog sensor heads which are mounted at the outermost area of the satellite’s outer surface to ensure maximum signal availability. The analog signal processing board is arranged redundantly as well.
A further reference sensor is the fluxgate MFS (cold redundant) which is needed for magnetic field determination and MCS control input. The angular rate is determined besides the ASC mainly by the cold redundant IMU. - The orbit determination is performed by a cold redundant GPS system. The position and time data obtained by the GPS is introduced into the orbit estimator in the ONS (Onboard Navigation System) module.
The robustness of the AOCS is realized by redundancy of H/W components and a “configuration management system” to handle the redundancy. The autonomy requires onboard failure detection and diagnosis. Another design aspect for robustness is a robust control loop to react against perturbation and component anomaly with sufficient stability margin. Also essential for a seamless filtering and processing of AOCS data is the autonomous monitoring of the “timings” of all AOCS threads and processes. 23) 24)
Figure 6: Overview of the S/W and H/W components of the AOCS (image credit: DLR)
The AOCS S/W is build up as an object oriented and modular application with a static architecture. The break down into several layers (Figure 7) allows an autonomous and robust handling of each feature and was extensively proven during the BIRD mission. The S/W runs as an application for the real time operating system BOSS (timing accuracy 1 ms) on the SBC.
- The lowest layer consists of the interface modules to the hardware components and the ONS module. The low level data processing and formatting of actuator and sensor data takes place in this layer.
- A layer above resides the so called EPC (Estimator, Predictor, Controller) layer, in which the actual control task takes place. The encapsulating EPC module is a combination of state estimation, prediction (Kalman filter) and state control. The estimator, predictor and controller modules form together with the mode processor the core of the control S/W.
- The topmost layer contains the TMTC (telemetry and telecommand) interface of the AOCS and its components. A very elementary role in the FDIR is taken by the surveillance module, which is responsible for monitoring the thread timing.
The redundant GPS system is referred to as AGPS-1 (Astrofein GPS-1) which is being space-qualified on this mission. AGPS-1 is based on the the Phoenix-Sensor and calculation algorithm of DLR/GSOC and fulfills the following technical specifications: 25)
- 12 channels
- Code L1 C/A and carrier
- Position accuracy 10 m (3D 1σ)
- Velocity accuracy 0.1 m/s (3D 1σ)
- Time signal accuracy 0.2 µs
- Warm start TTFF < 2 min
- Cold start TTFF < 15 min (90%)
- 1 Hz update rate of navigation data
- Operation temperature -20 to +50ºC, storage temperature -30ºC to +70ºC
- 1.1 W power consumption (for one branch)
- 230 g (for PCB version)
- 160 x 100 x 25 mm (for PCB version).
The system offers a built-in orbit propagator to aid the initial acquisition and to allow a short time-to-first-fix. Due to a separate provided memory for the GPS catalog, the system can make a warm start, also in the case when it was nearly shut down.
Figure 7: EPC module within a control cycle
EPS (Electric Power Subsystem): The EPS consists of a triple junction GaAs solar array, PCDU (Power Control and Distribution Units), and a NiH2 cell battery of 240 Ah capacity. The PCDU in turn consists of PCU+PDU. The solar array has one fixed panel and two deployable panels. Electrical power of 220 W (maximum power point) is provided. Use of regulated and unregulated power modules.
Figure 8: Photo of the NiH2 cells and PCDU (image credit: AstroFein)
The SBC (Spacecraft Bus Computer) controls all activities of the subsystems and the satellite bus. The SBC consists of 4 identical boards (2 in hot, 2 in cold redundancy) and watchdog circuits for failure detection and recovery. The architecture of the redundant SBC boards (nodes) is totally symmetric; each board is able to execute all control tasks. One node (the worker) is controlling the satellite while a second node (supervisor) is supervising the correct operation of the worker node. The two other node computers are spare components and are disconnected.
TCS (Thermal Control Subsystem): A semi-active TCS was developed to keep the temperature of the satellite and all of its components within the parameters of normal operating temperatures. It consists mainly of a MLI (Multi-Layer Insulation), heat pipes, the radiator, temperature sensors and heaters. The MLI detaches the satellite thermally from its environment, which means that an exchange can only take place via the radiator. The radiator is coated with a special white paint, which remains stable over long periods of time and has a good absorption-emission ratio. The radiator is mounted on the underside of the satellite, which generally does not face either the sun or Earth.- The heat pipes lead waste heat emanating from the payload directly to the radiator to avoid compromising the satellite bus components. Additional heat can be generated by the heater, should the satellite cool down excessively.
Table 2: Overview of key parameters of the TET spacecraft bus
RF communications: An S-band system is used with hot redundant receivers and cold redundant transmitters. The downlink transmission rates are 137.5 kbit/s or 2.2 Mbit/s. The transmitter and receiver channels are redundant and can be switched to the omni-directional low gain antenna system or to the high gain antenna.
The system can emit the telemetry via the redundant transfer switches and the omni-directional low gain antennas, or the directional high gain antenna. The entire system is designed in accordance with the international CCSDS standard (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems), and in its current configuration allows uplink speeds of 4 kbit/s and downlink speeds of 2.2 Mbit/s.
Figure 9: Block diagram of the TM/TC subsystem (image credit: AstroFein)
In 2010, the TET bus is a commercially available product of Astro- und Feinwerktechnik that is offered to the microsatellite community. Due to market requests there are plans for a bus upgrade to include the following items (Ref.10) :
- Higher payload mass (≥ 70 kg) and increased envelope
- More power for the payload
- X-band downlink for payload data
- Propulsion subsystem (as optional piggyback system, will be part of payload mass).
Figure 10: Photo of TET-1 in January 2011 prior to shipment to the launch site (image credit: Kayser-Threde)
Launch: The TET-1 spacecraft was launched on July 22, 2012 as a secondary payload to the Kanopus-V-N 1 primary spacecraft of Roskosmos/Roshydromet/Planeta on a Soyuz-FG Fregat launch vehicle. The launch site was the Baikonur Cosmodrome, Kazakhstan. The launch provider was Starsem. 26) 27)
Note: The TET-1 spacecraft has been ready for launch since the beginning of 2011. The last launch date for Kanopus-Vulkan was scheduled for September 2011. However, the Soyuz launch vehicle experienced a failure on August 24, 2011, carrying a Progress M-12M capsule filled with supplies for the ISS (International Space Station). This event resulted in a failure investigation and in a follow-up delay of all planned Soyuz launches. - In particular, the long launch delay was due to the still incomplete readiness status of the primary spacecraft, a fate often experienced by the secondary payloads.
The secondary payloads on this flight were:
• BelKa-2 (Belarusian space apparatus-2), a minisatellite imaging mission of Belarus (NASRB) with a mass of ~ 400 kg
• TET-1 (Technologie Erprobungs Träger-1), a technology probe of DLR, Germany with a mass of 120 kg
• Zond-PP, a microsatellite of IRE (Institute of Radiotechnology and Electronics), Moscow, Russia for technology demonstrations.
• exactView-1 [ formerly ADS-1B (AIS Data Services-1B)], a communicvation microsatellite with a mass of 100 kg, [AIS (Automatic Identification System) application] of exactEarth (COM DEV), Canada.
Orbit: Sun-synchronous circular orbit, altitude of ~ 510 km (of TET-1), inclination = 97.8º, period = 98 minutes.
Kanopus-V-N 1, BelKa-2 and TET-1 were released into an orbit of ~ 510 km. Afterwards, Fregat had to maneuver to a higher ~800 km orbit to deploy Zond-PP and the exactView-1 payloads. All satellites were succesfully deployed and Fregat made a deorbit maneuver.
Figure 11: Photo of the Soyuz-FG Fregat payloads prior to launch (image credit: Roskosmos)
• Starting on Novemver 01, 2013, TET-1 is being used as the first satellite of the FireBird mission of DLR (German Aerospace Center). 28)
All payloads are being operated successfully. During the 3rd TET Customer Days in March 2013, the payload providers presented also their scientific and technology (interim) results. The occasion provided information on the on-going TET-1 mission through current results and feedback from the experimenters. Further improvements to mission operations have been discussed, and a programmatic outlook on future OOV (On-Orbit Verification) missions completed the program.
• October 16, 2012: The TET-1 satellite started its operational phase after a review board gave its permission. 34)
• August 10, 2012: Continuation of the commissioning phase (testing of all subsystems). The LEOP phase was ended 1 week after launch. 35)
• July 24, 2012: In LEOP (Launch and Early Orbit Phase), DLR/GSOC conducted initial test with the spacecraft subsystems involving in particular the various attitude modes. 36)
Experiment complement in the Payload Segment:
The payload segment contains the payload itself, parts of the AOCS and one of the low gain antennas. Due to the design the sole mechanical and thermal interface between payload and satellite bus is the payload platform, which allows an easy and fast integration of the pre-assembled payload. - This payload platform can be designed as an optical bench (like on BIRD), but in the TET-1 mission it was not required. 37)
For TET-1, a total of 11 experiments have been selected which are covering a range of technologies. The experiments are developed by the individual providers according to specific TET standards and are thoroughly acceptance tested at Kayser-Threde before integration in the payload segment of the satellite.
• Three different types of next generation solar cells including thin-layer technology (Figure 20).
• Lithium polymer battery
• Two GPS receiver systems
• Sensor bus system
• Demonstration of a picosatellite propulsion system: Aquajet
• Test of a new infrared camera as follow-up of the BIRD camera system
• Test of new computer hardware system
• RF communication system.
Table 4: Overview of the TET-1 experiment complement 38)
The accommodation of the experiments in the Payload Segment is shown in Figure 15. The accommodation has been driven by the various experiments needs as e.g. viewing directions, unobstructed view angle for antennas, heat dissipation, etc. Thermal analyses, power budget and data handling considerations were performed to establish mission scenarios which are fulfilling the individual operational requirements of the experiments as e.g. number of experiment cycles, durations and timelines which are compliant with the satellite resources. The solar cell experiments have been accommodated on the sun pointing side of TET-1 next to the satellite bus solar arrays (Figure 20).
Figure 12: Accommodation of the payload onto TET-1 (image credit: DLR) 39)
Data Handling Modules (Ref. 14):
Figure 13 shows the block diagram of the CPU (Central Processing Unit) module and Figure 14 the top side of the CPU board. The central parts are the radiation tolerant LEON-III-CPU and a radiation tolerant system FPGA (RTAX-FPGA). These two components contain with exception of the memory devices and the physical interfaces all essential logic elements.
Figure 13: Block diagram of the CPU module (image credit: Kayser-Threde)
Figure 14: Top side view of the CPU module (image credit: Kayser-Threde)
The CPU LEON3-FT, CID-7 type with FPU of Gaisler Research has been used. This is a failure tolerant version of the LEON-3 CPU, which is integrated in an Actel RTAX-2000 FPGA This configuration has a performance of 20 MIPS. The LEON3-FT CPU is based of the SPARC-V8 architecture.
The system-FPGA contains the following functions:
- Memory interface for SDRAM with Reed-Solomon error correction and DMA controller for die image data of the SpaceWire interfaces.
- 2 asynchronous serial interfaces (UART)
- 2 synchronous serial interfaces for the telemetry-IF of the CPU modules
- 1 fast serial interface (SpaceWire) for control of the digital boards
- 2 interfaces for the PPS signals of the CPU modules
- 1 SpaceWire core for the communication with the digital-IO module
- Latch-up protection logic.
The SDRAM memory on the CPU module amounts to 768 MByte and is split into two banks. The useful payload data memory amounts to 512 MByte; the remaining 256 MByte are used for error correction. The CPU module contains two EEPROMS 28LV011 from Maxwell with a memory size of 1 Mbit each. In one EEPROM the Bootloader is located, in the other one the Flashloader. Two flash memory modules with a capacity of 2 GB are on the CPU module. The second one is for redundancy purpose.
Figure 15: Integrated payload compartment (image credit: Kayser-Threde)
PSS (Payload Supply System):
PSS (N6) provides the interface between the satellite bus and the experiments, a fixed and a flexible part that can easily be adjusted to the experiments needs. The overall objective of the experiment are: 40)
• Reduction of mass
• Provision of more flexibility regarding design and integration
• Simplified assembly, integration und test procedures.
Figure 16: Schematic view of PSS (image credit: Kayser-Threde)
PSS, developed by Kayser Threde, is a modular system consisting of a backplane and set of different types of boards in Europe Card size (160 mm x 100 mm):
- Two processor boards (1 main, 1 cold redundant) used for all PSS activities, for control of the experiments and for communication with the satellite
- One digital and one analog I/O board providing the electrical interfaces to the experiments The range of interfaces comprises serial communication with RS-422, I2C and SpaceWire, general purpose digital inputs and outputs, outputs for the distribution of PPS-signals, high precision differential analog inputs and inputs for temperature sensors of type AD590 or PT1000.
- Five power boards for regulated for unregulated voltages for supply of the experiments and the needs of the PSS. All power channels can be switched on/off independently by relays, all channels are protected by latched current limiters and they are equipped with sensor circuits for monitoring voltages and currents. For TET-1 regulated (6) and unregulated (8) voltages with up to 8 A of current are provided.
Figure 17: Testing of the payload supply system in a test rack (image credit: Kayser-Threde)
The PSS is accommodated in the Electronic Segment of the satellite bus next to the satellite bus controller. The electronic segment provides space for 12 boards in 3 stacks as shown in Figure 17. Thus, it was possible to integrate one of the experiments, the N17 board within the Payload Supply System. The block diagram (Figure 18) shows the PSS with the various interfaces.
Figure 18: Block diagram and external interfaces of the PSS (image credit: Kayser-Threde)
BOSS ( Embedded Operating System design for dependability and for formal verification)
BOSS is a real-time operating system of BIRD microsatellite heritage (launch Oct. 22, 2001) which also provided the original name, namely BOSS (BIRD Operating System 'Simple') of the system. FhG/FIRST [Fraunhofer Gesellschaft/Institut für Rechnerarchitektur und Softwaretechnik (Institute of Computer Architecture and Software Technology), Berlin Adlershof, Germany] is the developer of the BOSS system. The SBC (Spacecraft Bus Computer) of TET-1 employs an an advanced version of the original BOSS system that assumes the transmission, processing, and memory of all data on board the satellite. In addition to data acquisition from individual subsystems, such as the experiments conducted on board or the power supply, it also takes over communications with ground control. With its multitude of interfaces to subsystems, components, and application software, the SBC constitutes a highly complex system with the following features: 41)
• Redundancy: A highly redundant architecture with a quadruple computer node is being used. Each computer node is providing redundant processing and memory structures. To prevent data loss in case of memory errors, each computer node is equipped with a shadow storage. The content of the shadow storage will replace the memory content should an error be detected in a node. The control and communication unit is located in a FPGA (Field-Programmable Gate Array).
• Latch-up protection: Radiation in particular presents a major challenge to computer systems on board satellites. High-energy particles are constantly impinging on the satellite computer’s components which can lead to a SEU (Single Event Upset). In a SEU, a so-called bit flip, in which the state of a bit is altered, can cause a malfunction of the affected component. To avoid this, FhG/FIRST is employing radiation-tolerant components as well as a latch-up protection: through continuous voltage metering in various modules of the computer, a short-term shutoff of the affected component is carried out in case of disproportionately high voltage rises, thus preventing destruction.
• EDAC (Error Detection and Correction subsystem): The EDAC of the SBC works according to the monitor-worker principle: two active computer nodes work together and monitor each other. A malfunction is for instance detected by one computer node not sending data at all, or sending obviously false data, that do not match the other computer node’s results. The computer node receiving such false data or none at all, detects this and prompts a reset of the respective other computer node. - Furthermore, each computer node can opt for a reset itself when it detects contradictory data. In the extreme case of one or both computer nodes delivering differing results even after a reset, the remaining computer nodes take over control. As long as they are not needed, they form the so-called emergency reserve: during this time, they are inactive and thus not subject to radiation-induced aging.
Figure 19: Functional block diagram of the TET-1 SBC (image credit: FhG/FIRST)
The microprocessor board has dimensions of 100 mm x 170 mm x 20 mm, a mass of 0.166 kg, a radiation hardness of > 13 kRad (tested), a power consumption of 4 W (max), and a temperature range of -40º to 80ºC.
Figure 20: Accommodation of the three solar cell experiments (image credit: DLR)
NOX (Navigation and Occultation Experiment):
The objective of NOX (N16) is to demonstrate and validate the use of a COTS-based dual-frequency GPS receiver, originally designed for terrestrial use only, can be successfully employed in Low-Earth Orbit (LEO) satellite applications. As a secondary objective, the technical characterization of the receiver is supplemented by the collection of scientific GPS measurements and their use in two key applications: precise orbit determination (POD) and occultation measurements. 42) 43)
The NOX payload comprises a PolaRx2 GPS receiver developed by Septentrio, Belgium. The PolaRx2 receiver is built around the GNSS Receiver Core (GreCo), which represents an advanced version of the earlier AGGA0 chip. It offers a total of 48 channels and can thus track C/A code, P1 code and P2 code for up to 16 GPS satellites. The tracking and navigation software is executed on a MachZ system-on-a-chip computer that includes an i486 core and can be operated at up to 128 MHz.
For use within the NOX experiment, the PolaRx2 receiver is complemented by a dedicated interface board (Figure 21), which performs the power conditioning and latch-up protection and provides the necessary line drivers for serial communication and discrete signal. The total mass of NOX is 1 kg, power consumption of 8 W.
Figure 21: Architecture of the NOX system (image credit: DLR)
Aside from the electronic box, the NOX payload comprises a switchable pair of GPS antennas, one pointing to the zenith and used for POD, and a second one oriented in anti-flight direction (pointing at the Earth horizon) devoted to occultation measurements. The switching between these antennas is performed via an R/F relay. A dual-frequency low-noise amplifier is used to amplify the signals received by the passive antennas to a level suitable for processing by the GPS receiver.
Aquajet is a small satellite propulsion system designed and developed at AI (Aerospace Innovation GmbH), Berlin in close cooperation with the Aerospace Institute (ILR) at TUB (Technical University Berlin). The objective is on-orbit qualification/verification of the Aquajet system performance on the TET-1 mission. The Aquajet micropropulsion device is an enabling system, small enough to provide its services to future pico- and nanosatellite missions. In particular, the micropropulsion device is an enabler for the positional control of nanosatellite constellations. 44)
The following parameters pertain to Aquajet:
• The resistojet propulsion system is based on environmentally benign (“green“) and safe propellants (water & anti-freeze)
• The system is ECSS (European Cooperation for Space Standards) compliant in development and testing procedures
• Instrument size: 100 mm x 100 mm x 30 mm; total mass: ~0.5 kg
• Highly integrated propulsion module including PMD (Propellant Management Device), redundant sensor systems and space qualified interface electronics
• The modular design leads to a flexible, easy-to-handle device capable to support future PnP (Plug and Play) applications
• A customized design of the propulsion module is also possible. An Aquajet version for microsatellites is currently under development (development model finished, EM in preparation)
• The Aquajet ground qualification for TET-1 was completed in 2009. The PFM was delivered in September 2009.
Figure 22: PFM (Proto Flight Model) of Aquajet (image credit: AI)
Figure 23: Accommodation of Aquajet on TET-1 (image credit: Kayser-Threde)
Optical IR payload:
The optical payload, designed and developed at DLR, consists of an assembly of three pushbroom cameras, one in the VNIR (Visible Near Infrared) range and two imagers in the infrared region. The overall objective is the detection and quantitative analysis of HTE (High Temperature Events) like wildfires and volcanoes. 45) 46) 47)
Time is essential to support most effectively the decisions of fire managers in fire suppression planning, crew mobilization & movement. Therefore, on-board processing of fire front attributes, including geo-referencing and their direct transmission to the user on ground is a challenging task for small satellites, but it shall be technically feasible.
Key procedures for on-board fire detection and analysis are pre-processing and extraction of fire attributes. The pre-processing includes:
- Radiometric correction (using system correction files)
- Inter-channel co-registration (using system correction files), and
- Geo-referencing (using on-board navigational information).
The fire detection and analysis extraction of fire attributes includes:
- Background classification for threshold adaptation: land, water, clouds, sun glints
- Hotspot detection (based principally on the BIRD algorithm)
- Consolidation of hot pixels in hot clusters
- Extraction of attributes of hot clusters, such as coordinates, FRP (Fire Radiative Power) and, optionally, fire line strength, effective fire temperature and area.
Table 5: Specification of the optical payload
Figure 24: Photo of the optical payload (image credit: DLR)
Figure 25: Schematic view of the optical payload of TET-1 and BIROS (image credit: DLR)
The on orbit verification of on-board fire detection and analysis will be tested on Germany’s first Technologie Erprobungs Traeger (TET-1). The optical payload of TET-1 is of BIRD mission heritage (launch of BIRD in 2001) together with a special signal processor to demonstrate the on-board processing of fire attributes based on the sensor data obtained over wildfires.
BIROS (Berlin InfraRed Optical System) is a follow-on fire detection mission of DLR with a planned launch in 2014. BIROS will be based on the satellite bus as developed for TET-1.
The BIROS sensor system is nearly identical to the optical payload of TET-1. It will be built – as the BIRD and TET-1 sensors which were designed by the DLR Institute of Robotics and Mechatronics / Dept. of Optical Information System (DLR-RM-OS) in Berlin-Adlershof.
Keramis-2 payload (Ceramic Microwave Circuits for Satellite Communications):
KERAMIS (Keramische Mikrowellenschaltkreise für die Satellitenkommunikation) stands for the continued R&D activities of an industrial-academic consortium of partners experienced in the design, development, and fabrication of compact microwave modules based on the ceramic multilayer technology LTCC (Low-Temperature Cofired Ceramic) for satellite communications at Ka-band frequencies. The overall objective is the development of innovative and inexpensive components for future applications in multimedia satellite communications. This technology project (N18) is funded by DLR and BMWi (Bundesministeriums für Wirtschaft und Technologie) to be flight-validated on TET-1. 48) 49) 50)
The LTCC technology offers great potential for cost-efficient three-dimensional hybrid-integrated hermetic modules of high functional density incorporating active and passive sub-modules and circuitry. Specific challenges of the project are:
• to control the high structural precision required for industrial components for spaceborne microwave applications
• to balance fabrication issues and microwave performance
• to demonstrate full space qualification.
For these reasons, specific flight experiments have been developed and implemented on board of a test satellite for remote testing in space. A contribution to the competitiveness of the German-European space program as well as the approval of innovative modular microwave design can be considered essential outcomes of the satellite flight.
Three experiments have been developed as payload equipment for OOV (On-Orbit-Verification) in a national R&D LEO satellite (TET-1):
1) Experiment 1: Switch Matrix
The TU (Technische Universität) Ilmenau has developed an LTCC module incorporating a reconfigurable 4 x 4 switch matrix. The double-sided module integrates space-qualified PIN-diode SP4T switch ICs with broadband transmission lines and signal distribution networks. Between 18 and 27 GHz, a complete signal path displays return loss > 20 dB, insertion loss < 6 dB (without amplification), and path isolation > 50 dB. The module measures less than 2.5 cm x 2.5 cm x 1 cm and weighs about 20 g. To monitor performance and reliability on orbit, the flight module will be equipped with a digital controller, redundant signal sources, power detectors, and temperature sensors. The industrial partners of the consortium support the fabrication, implementation and space qualification of the payload module.
Figure 26: Illustration of the 4 x 4 matrix (TU Ilmenau)
2) Experiment 2: Synthesizer
IMST GmbH (Institut für Mobil- und Satellitenfunktechnik) of Kamp-Lintfort is responsible for the design and development of tow Ka-band (20 GHz) payload boards. These experimental units are composed of modular LTCC components in hermetically sealed housings. Standard LGA or wire bond transitions are applied for HF transitions. The LTCC components are mounted on a multilayer PTFE (Polytetrafluorethylene - Teflon ®) substrate. The heart of the module is a fractional-N synthesizer in BiCMOS and CMOS technology with a SiGe VCO (Voltage Controlled Oscillator). Additional components are hybrid and MMIC (Monolithic Microwave Integrated Circuit) amplifiers, mixers, SPDT (Single Pole Double Throw) switch and power detectors. The modular concept allows the implementation of reliable, flexible and space qualified transceiver units for multimedia satellite applications at low costs. The multilayer LTCC is manufactured by MSE (Micro Systems Engineering GmbH), while RHE Microsystems GmbH of Radeberg processes the housing as well as the assembly and integration techniques.
Figure 27: Photo of the SiGe fractional-N synthesizer in the LTCC housing (image credit: IMST)
3) Experiment 3: Transceiver
The University Hamburg-Harburg is responsible for conversion of a transmitted analog S-band signal to Ka-band and vice versa; this conversion concept test is the stated objective of the payload module. To this end, different transceiver configurations are designed, which consist of previously developed basic LTCC modules like mixers, signal sources and power amplifiers. The general suitability and versatility of advanced LTCC packaging in combination with hybrid integration methods for high reliability applications will be verified.
Figure 28: Photo of the flip-chip components on multilayer PTFE (image credit: University Hamburg-Harburg)
Figure 29: Photo of the open Keramis payload box with 6 experimental boards (image credit: IMST)
Figure 30: Photo of the Keramis-2 payload (image credit: IMST)
Figure 31: Block diagram of the TET-1 communications system with the integrated Keramis payload (image credit: IMST)
MORE (Memory Orbit Radiation Experiment)
• In-orbit measurement of radiation effects in NAND (Not AND logic) flash devices
- Static /dynamic SEUs (Single Event Upsets)
- SELs (Single Event Latchups)
- SEFIs (Single-event Functional Interrupts)
• Measurement on different device types
- 32 Gbit Samsung K9WBG08U1M
- 8 Gbit Micron MT29F8G08AAAWP
• Comparison with available test results at heavy ion accelerators
• Qualification (TRL > = 5) for use of NAND flash devices in future solid state mass memories
- ESA + national missions: EO + science platforms
- Instrument applications: Image buffers for space cameras.
The test philosophy is to subject the specimens to an operational environment which is similar to real mass memory.
• Long-term static error collection in storage mode (biased /unbiased)
• Verification of countermeasures against SEFIs.
The following design features are implemented:
• Single PCB (Printed Circuit Board) layout
• Complete control logic including the processor in one FPGA
• Processor softcore @ 16 MHz
• Reed-Solomon ECC (Error Correction Code) protected processor SDRAM (Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory)
• 4 independent memory partitions equipped with
- 96 32 Gbit NAND flash devices (3.375 Tbit)
- 32 8 Gbit NAND flash devices (0.25)
- Total 3.625 Tbit = 464 GByte
• All partitions are directly connected to FPGA
• Each partition with 8 device groups (7 Samsung + 1 Micron) and individual LU protection switch
• Standard RS 422 I/F
• Integrated power converter.
The main features of the software are:
• Bootloader hard-wired in FPGA
• Software upload supported
• Autonomous test operation of NAND flash devices in software
• Autonomous error recording & evaluation.
Figure 32: Block diagram of MORE (image credit: TU Braunschweig)
An Actel ProASIC AEPE3000L in FG896 ball grid housing contains the whole digital logic. This is mainly a LEON processor with its periphery. The high pin count allows the direct connection of the whole memory array with its 4 data and control busses independent for each memory partition. So, each partition can be switched on and off independently. The width of the data bus of 32 bits is chosen to fit to the bus width of the processor. The LU switches are controlled by the microprocessor.
Figure 33: Photo of the MORE PFM without cover (image credit: TU Braunschweig)
Qualification of Lithium-Polymer battery:
The Li-Po battery test is being implemented by ASP (Advanced Space Power Equipment GmbH) of Salem-Neufrach, Germany. The objective of the experiment is to space qualify the following items: 54)
• Space qualification of German Li-Po (Lithium Polymer) cells
- Cycle stability of the cells
- Operation under vacuum conditions for 1 year
• Space qualification of ASP () Battery Management System
- Balancing of the Li-Po cells
- Monitoring of the relevant battery data.
Figure 34: Photo of the PFM battery during integration (image credit: ASP)
- Nominal voltage: 14.4 V
- End of charge voltage: 16.0 V
- Rated capacity: 7.5 Ah
- Rated energy density: 85 Wh/kg.
A redundant battery management system is provided to monitor all aspects of battery operations.
TFSC (Thin Film Solar Cell) experiment:
The TFSC test is developed by Solarion AG, Leipzig, and HTS GmbH, Coswig, Germany (actually a larger partnership from an academic and industrial background). The objective is to use flexible CIGS (Copper Indium Gallium Selenide) cells on a plastic substrate for power generation and to test their performance in the space environment. Of all thin film technologies, those based on CIGSe have the highest potential to reach attractive photovoltaic conversion efficiencies and combine these with low weight in order to realize high power densities on solar cell and generator level. The use of a flexible substrate ensures a high packing density. The demonstration of this enabling technology in space is of great interest because it offers possible applications in such niches as for space power satellites, solar sails or exploration missions. 55) 56)
Figure 35: General layout of the TFSC experiment (image credit: Solarion AG)
The TET-1 spacecraft is being monitored and controlled at DLR/GSOC using the DLR-owned S-band ground stations in Weilheim, Neustrelitz and SKT (Saskatoon) of CSA (Canadian Space Agency), the latter for the LEOP phase only. A PDC (Payload Data Center) will be provided at the location of the data reception station in Neustrelitz. The main tasks are acquisition, extraction, processing (formatting to a generic ASCII format) archiving and provision of payload data. The 11 users with their experiments onboard TET-1 retrieve (download) their data via a secure FTP interface (Ref. 37). 57) 58)
For the first year of operations the routine operations network is based on WHM and NST ground stations with 4 scheduled contacts per day, 1 contact over WHM and another 3 over NST. The WHM contact is the contact also used for uploading of telecommands while the 3 other contacts are used for payload data dump and telemetry only. If required, stations can be used interchangeable - increasing reliability of the ground segment.
Figure 36: Overview of the TET ground segment (image credit: DLR)
During the first year, all 11 payloads are operated by GSOC according to their respective requirements – which may be e.g. number of activation cycles, hours of operation or certain attitudes. Requirements have been collected by KTH (Kayser-Threde) from the payload owners. To generate a valid operations concept also the satellite bus capabilities must be collected and analyzed. All information together is stored in an Excel sheet, containing all payload activities for the first year of operation.
Figure 37: Functional architecture of the TET-1 ground system (image credit: DLR)
It is expected that the satellite will be significantly longer operational than the first planned year. Operations during an extended mission phases are not yet defined but the focus is placed on operations for the N15 infrared camera. Some other experiments may also be operated but only on request of the payload owner and if the payloads still operational.
Table 6: Different types of experiments on TET-1
1) Stefan Foeckersperger , Klaus Lattner, Clemens Kaiser, Silke Eckert, Wolfgang Bärwald, Swen Ritzmann, Peter Mühlbauer, Michael Turk, Philipp Willemsen, “The Modular German Microsatellite TET-1 for Technology On-Orbit Versification” Proceedings of the IAA Symposium on Small Satellite Systems and Services (4S), Rhodes, Greece, May 26-30, 2008, ESA SP-660, August 2008, IAC-08.B4.7.3, URL: http://www.kayser-threde.de/tet/downloads/Papers/IAC-08.B4.7.3.pdf
2) Peter Mühlbauer, Herbert Wüsten, Jens Richter, Michael Turk, Philip Willlemsen, Stefan Föckersperger, Sven Müncheberg, “Mission Operation, Ground Segment and Services for the German TET-1 Microsatellite (Technology Experiments Carrier),” Proceedings of the IAA Symposium on Small Satellite Systems and Services (4S), Rhodes, Greece, May 26-30, 2008, ESA SP-660, August 2008
4) Stefan Föckersperger, “On-Orbit Verifikation mit dem deutschen Kleinsatelliten TET-1,” Darmstadt, Sept. 23, 2008, URL: http://www.kayser-threde.de/tet/downloads/Papers/TET-1_Mission_230908.pdf
5) Stefan Foeckersperger, Clemens Kaiser, Klaus Lattner, Silke Eckert, Swen Ritzmann, Michael Turk, Robert Axmann, “The TET-1 Mission - current project status of the small satellite mission and outlook for a one year mission operation phase,” Proceedings of the 61st IAC (International Astronautical Congress), Prague, Czech Republic, Sept. 27-Oct. 1, 2010, IAC-10.B4.6A.9
6) S. Föckersperger, “The TET-1 Mission for Technology On-Orbit Verification,” Kayser-Threde, July 2010, URL: http://www.kayser-threde.de/tet/downloads/Praesentationen/1_TET%20KT%20General/3_TET-1_mission_pdf_version.pdf
7) Clemens Kaiser, Stefan Föckersperger, Timo Stuffler, “Future SMALL Satellite EO Missions based on TET,” Proceedings of IAC 2011 (62nd International Astronautical Congress), Cape Town, South Africa, Oct. 3-7, 2011, paper: IAC-11-B4.4.13
8) “On-Orbit Verification TET,” Kayser-Threde, May, 2010, URL: http://www.kayser-threde.de/tet/downloads/2010-05_TET_2s_engl.pdf
9) Stefan Föckersperger, Gavin Staton, Michael Turk, “Future Small Satellite EO Missions Based on TET,” Proceedings of the 4S (Small Satellites Systems and Services) Symposium, Portoroz, Slovenia, June 4-8, 2012
10) S. Eckert, S. Ritzmann, S. Roemer , W. Bärwald, “The TET-1 Satellite Bus – A High Reliability Bus for Earth Observation, Scientific and Technology Verification Missions in LEO,” Proceedings of the Symposium on Small Satellite Systems and Services (4S), Funchal, Madeira, Portugal, May 31-June 4, 2010
11) S. Eckert, S. Ritzmann, C. Schultz, S. Roemer, W. Bärwald, “A German Microsatellite for On-Orbit -Verification,” Proceedings of the 7th IAA Symposium on Small Satellites for Earth Observation, Berlin, Germany, May 4-8, 2009, URL: http://media.dlr.de:8080/erez4/erez?cmd=get&src=os/IAA/archiv7/Presentations/1303_IAA-B7-1303_TET-1.pdf
12) S. Eckert, “The TET-Satellite Bus,” 2nd TET Customer Day, Kayser-Threde, Munich, July 5, 2010, URL: http://www.kayser-threde.de/tet/downloads/Praesentationen/1_TET%20KT%20General/7_AFW_TET.pdf
13) S. Roemer, S. Eckert, “The TET Satellite Bus – A high reliability bus for LEO missions,” 8th IAA (International Academy of Astronautics) Symposium on Small Satellites for Earth Observation, Berlin, Germany, April 4-8, 2011; URL of the presentaion IAA-B8-1001: http://media.dlr.de:8080/erez4/erez?cmd=get&src=os/IAA/archiv8/Presentations/IAA-B8-1001.pdf
14) Heinz-Volker Heyer, Stefan Föckersperger, Jörg Würker, Alfred Hönle, Steffen Grieser, Michael Turk, Stephan Römer, “The On-Orbit-Verification Satellite TET-1 with the Payload Supply System Ready for Launch,” Proceedings of the DASIA (DAta Systems In Aerospace) 2011 Conference, San Anton, Malta, May 17-20, 2011, ESA SP-694, August 2011
15) TET-1 Satellite Bus,” Astrofein, URL: http://www.astrofein.com/2728/dwnld/admin/Brochure_Satellite_TET-1.pdf
16) “Small satellite TET-1,” Astrofein, Sept. 14, 2010, URL: http://www.astrofein.com/2728/dwnld/admin/AstroFein_TET_EN.pdf
17) Sergio Montenegro, Lutz Dittrich, “The core avionics system for the DLR compact-satellite series,” Proceedings of the IAA Symposium on Small Satellite Systems and Services (4S), Rhodes, Greece, May 26-30, 2008, ESA SP-660, August 2008
18) Zizung Yoon, Thomas Terzibaschian, Christian Raschke , Olaf Maibaum, “Robust and fault tolerant AOCS of the TET satellite,” Proceedings of the 7th IAA Symposium on Small Satellites for Earth Observation, Berlin, Germany, May 4-7, 2009, IAA-B7-0704
19) Zizung Yoon, Thomas Terzibaschian, Christian Raschke, Olaf Maibaum, “Development of the Fault Tolerant Attitude Control System of OOV-TET Satellite,” Proceedings of the Symposium on Small Satellite Systems and Services (4S), Funchal, Madeira, Portugal, May 31-June 4, 2010
20) Sebastian Löw, Jaap Herman, Daniel Schulze, Christian Raschke, “Modes and More - Finding the Right Attitude for TET-1,” Proceedings of SpaceOps 2012, The 12th International Conference on Space Operations, Stockholm, Sweden, June 11-15, 2012, URL: http://www.spaceops2012.org/proceedings/documents/id1274662-Paper-002.pdf
21) Stephan Stoltz, Christian Raschke, Katrin Courtois, “RW 90, a smart reaction wheel – Progress from BIRD to TET-1,” 8th IAA (International Academy of Astronautics) Symposium on Small Satellites for Earth Observation, Berlin, Germany, April 4-8, 2011; URL of presentation, IAA-B8-1204, http://media.dlr.de:8080/erez4/erez?cmd=get&src=os/IAA/archiv8/Presentations/IAA-B8-1204.pdf
22) S. Stoltz, C. Raschke, S. Roemer, “Advanced sensors for small satellites,” Proceedings of GNC 2011, 8th International ESA Conference on Guidance, Navigation & Control Systems, Carlsbad (Karlovy Vary), Czech Republic, June 5-10, 2011
23) Zizung Yoon, Thomas Terzibaschian, Christian Raschke , Olaf Maibaum, “Fault Tolerant Attitude Control System of OOV-TET Satellite - Design and Test Results,” Proceedings of the Symposium on Small Satellite Systems and Services (4S), Funchal, Madeira, Portugal, May 31-June 4, 2010
24) Z. Yoon, T. Terzibaschian, C. Raschke, O. Maibaum, “Development and verification of the fault tolerant attitude control system of OOV-TET satellite,” Proceedings of GNC 2011, 8th International ESA Conference on Guidance, Navigation & Control Systems, Carlsbad (Karlovy Vary), Czech Republic, June 5-10, 2011
25) Staphan Stoltz, Stephan Roemer, “The AGPS-1 - A redundant GPS-unit for nano-satellites,” Second Nanosatellite Symposium, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan, March 14-16, 2011
26) “German TET-1 small satellite launched,” DLR, July 22, 2012, URL: http://www.dlr.de/dlr/en/desktopdefault.aspx/tabid-10081/151_read-4318/
27) “Soyuz FG Launch Updates - July 2012,” Spaceflight 101, July 22, 2012, URL: http://www.spaceflight101.com/soyuz-fg-launch-updates-kanopus-belka-exactview-zond-tet.html
28) Norbert M. K. Lemke, Stefan Föckersperger, Peter Hofmann, Timo Stuffler, Silke Eckert, Michael Turk, Eckehard Lorenz, “The TET-1 On-Orbit Verification Mission – Status and Future Opportunities,” Proceedings of the 64th International Astronautical Congress (IAC 2013), Beijing, China, Sept. 23-27, 2013, paper: IAC-13-B4.3.13
29) Hubert Reile, Eckehard Lorenz, Thomas Terzibaschian, “The FireBird mission – a scientific mission for Earth observation and hot spot detection,” DLR, April 8, 2013, URL: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CC
31) Martin Brechtelsbauer, Christopher Schmidt, Peter Becker, Christian Fuchs, “Application of an optical data link on DLR’s BIROS satellite,” URL: http://www.spaceops.org/images/spaceops/5-OSIRIS.pdf
32) Information provided by Robert Axmann, DLR/GSOC, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany.
33) Robert Axmann, Tobias Lesch, Marcin Gnat, Heiko Damerow, Jens Richter, “The TET-1 Operational Ground System,” Proceedings of the 9th IAA Symposium on Small Satellites for Earth Observation, Berlin, Germany, April 8-12, 2013, paper: IAA-B9-0801
34) “Deutsche Kleinsatellitenmission TET-1 nimmt Regelbetrieb auf,” Kayser-Threde Press Release, Oct. 16, 2012, URL: http://www.kayser-threde.de/download/press/pr-2012-10-16-232-de.pdf
35) Michael Turk, “TET-1, weitere Fortschritte,” DLR, Aug. 10, 2012, URL: http://www.dlr.de/blogs/desktopdefault.aspx/tabid-8029/13766_read-592/
36) Carsten Dietrich, “TET-1, Der Satellit wird ausgetestet,” DLR, July 24, 2012, URL: http://www.dlr.de/blogs/desktopdefault.aspx/tabid-8029/13766_read-577/
37) Stefan Föckersperger, Klaus Lattner, Clemens Kaiser, Silke Eckert, Swen Ritzmann, Robert Axmann, Michael Turk, “The On-Orbit Verification Mission TET-1 - Project Status of the Small Satellite Mission & Outlook for the One Year Mission Operation Phase,” Proceedings of the Symposium on Small Satellite Systems and Services (4S), Funchal, Madeira, Portugal, May 31-June 4, 2010, URL: http://www.kayser-threde.de/tet/downloads/Papers/4S_Paper_TET-1_Madeira-2010.pdf
39) Sebastian Löw, Jaap Herma2, Daniel Schulze, Christian Raschke, “Modes and More,” Proceedings of SpaceOps 2012, The 12th International Conference on Space Operations, Stockholm, Sweden, June 11-15, 2012
40) Christoph Tiefenbeck, “TET-1 Payload N6 Sensorbus system,” 2nd TET Customer Day, Kayser-Threde, Munich, July 5, 2010, URL: http://www.kayser-threde.de/tet/downloads/Praesentationen/2_TET%20Payloads/N6_2nd_tet_customerday.pdf
41) Friedrich Schön, “Hardware BOSS,” 2nd TET Customer Day, Kyaser-Threde, Munich, July 5, 2010, URL: http://www.kayser-threde.de/tet/downloads/-BOSS-engl.pdf
42) M. Markgraf, C. Renaudie, O. Montenbruck, “The NOX Payload-Flight Validation of a low-cost Dual-Frequency GPS Receiver for Micro- and Nanosatellite Applications,” Proceedings of the IAA Symposium on Small Satellite Systems and Services (4S), Rhodes, Greece, May 26-30, 2008, ESA SP-660, August 2008 URL: http://www.weblab.dlr.de/rbrt/pdf/ESA4S_08.pdf
43) M. Markgraf, P. Swatschina, “The Navigation and Occultation eXperiment (NOX) onboard TET-1,” 2nd TET Customer Day, Kayser-Threde, Munich, Germany, July 5, 2010, URL: http://www.kayser-threde.de/tet/downloads/Praesentationen/2_TET%20Payloads/N16_2ndTetCustomerDay_N16-NOX_Markgraf.pdf
44) Harry Adirim, Norbert Pilz, Matthias Kreil, Michael Kron, Andrei Mitrofanow, “On-Orbit-Verification of Small Satellite Propulsion System Aquajet on TET-1,” 2nd TET Customer Day, Kayser-Threde, Munich, July 5.-6., 2010, URL: http://www.kayser-threde.de/tet/downloads/Praesentationen/2_TET%20Payloads/N7_2010-07-01%20OOV%20of%20Small%20Satellite%20Propulsion%20System%20AQUAJET.pdf
45) Stephan Roemer, Winfried Halle, “TET-1 and BIROS A semi-operational Fire Recognition Constellation,” UN/Austria/ESA Symposium on Small Satellite Programs for Sustainable Development: Payloads for Small Satellite Programs, Sept. 21-24, 2010, Graz, Austria
46) “Exposé, BIROS (Berlin InfraRed Optical System),” information provided by Winfried Halle of DLR
47) Eckehard Lorenz, “IR Payload auf TET (N15, N15.1),” July 5, 2010, URL: http://www.kayser-threde.de/tet/downloads/Praesentationen/2_TET%20Payloads/N15_Nutzlast_N15%20.pdf
49) Reinhard Kulke, Christian Hunscher, “KERAMIS-2, Ceramic Microwave Circuits for Satellite Communication,” TET Customer Day, Kayser-Threde, Munich, July 5, 2010, URL: http://www.kayser-threde.de/tet/downloads/Praesentationen/2_TET%20Payloads/N18_Keramis-TET1.pdf
50) Siegfried Voigt, “KERAMIS-2,” DLR, URL: http://www.dlr.de/rd/en/desktopdefault.aspx/tabid-4161/3338_read-5033/
51) T. Fichna, D. Walter, H. Michalik, “MORE, Memory Orbit Radiation Experiment,” TET Customer Day, Kayser-Threde, Munich, July 5, 2010, URL: http://www.kayser-threde.de/tet/downloads/Praesentationen/2_TET%20Payloads/N19_MORE_Presentation.pdf
52) T. Fichna, H. Michalik, F. Gliem, F. Bubenhagen, “MORE – Radiation measurement of NAND flash devices on TET-1,” 8th IAA (International Academy of Astronautics) Symposium on Small Satellites for Earth Observation, Berlin, Germany, April 4-8, 2011
53) K. Grürmann, T. Fichna, F. Bubenhagen, F. Gliem, H. Michalik, “MORE – radiation measurement of NAND-Flash devices on TET-1,” Proceedings of the 9th IAA Symposium on Small Satellites for Earth Observation, Berlin, Germany, April 8-12, 2013, paper: IAA-B9-0905P
54) Payload N1: Lithium Polymer Battery,” 2nd TET Customer Day, Kayser-Threde, Munich, July 5, 2010, URL: http://www.kayser-threde.de/tet/downloads/Praesentationen/2_TET%20Payloads/N1_2nd%20TET%20Customer%20Day%20N1.pdf
55) “On Orbit Verification of thin film solar cells,” 2nd TET Customer Day, Kayser-Threde, Munich, July 5, 2010,, URL: http://www.kayser-threde.de/tet/downloads/Praesentationen/2_TET%20Payloads/N2_Praesentation_N2_Solarion_2010eps.pdf
56) Sebastian Brunner, Kai Zajac, Michael Nadler, Klaus Seifart, Christian A. Kaufmann , Raquel Caballero , Hans-Werner Schock , Lars Hartmann, Karten Otte, Andreas Rahm, Christian Scheit, Hendrik Zachmann, Friedrich Kessler, Roland Würz, Peter Schülke, “Recent Progress Towards Space Applications of Thin Film Solar Cells – The German Joint Project “Flexible CIGSE Thin Film Solar Cells for Space Flight” and OOV,” Proceedings of the 9th European Space Power Conference, Saint Raphael, France, June 6-10, 2011, ESA SP-690
57) Robert Axmann, Peter Mühlbauer, Andreas Spörl, Michael Turk, Stefan Föckersperger , Jürgen Schmolke, “Operations Concept and Challenges for 11 Different Payloads on the TET-1 Mini-Satellite,” Proceedings of the Symposium on Small Satellite Systems and Services (4S), Funchal, Madeira, Portugal, May 31-June 4, 2010
58) Peter Mühlbauer, Robert Axmann, “TET-1 Bodensegment und Missionsbetrieb,” 2nd TET Customer Day, Kayser-Threde, Munich, July 5, 2010, URL: http://www.kayser-threde.de/tet/downloads/Praesentationen/1_TET%20KT%20General/6_TET-GSC-HO-0019_Bodensegment%20Praesentation%20zum%20TET%20Customer%20Day.pdf
The information compiled and edited in this article was provided by Herbert J. Kramer from his documentation of: ”Observation of the Earth and Its Environment: Survey of Missions and Sensors” (Springer Verlag) as well as many other sources after the publication of the 4th edition in 2002. - Comments and corrections to this article are always welcome for further updates.