ISS Utilization: AMS (Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer)
AMS is a NASA-selected payload, a fundamental physics experiment and the first sensitive spaceborne magnetic spectrometer, with a broad international cooperation basis. The project is in fact the culmination of 30 years of experience and research of a group of high-energy physicists led by 1976 Nobel Laureate Samuel C. C. Ting and by Thomas Dudley Cabot of the Laboratory for Nuclear Science at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT).
Construction, integration, testing and operation of the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer (AMS-02 Experiment) is carried out by an international team, referred to as the AMS Collaboration, composed of about 600 physicists and 56 institutes and organizations from 16 countries: North America (USA, Mexico), Asia (China, Korea, Taiwan), Europe, including nine ESA Member States (Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, The Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Switzerland) and Russia, and organized under an agreement between NASA and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). AMS-02 will not only be the largest scientific instrument to be installed on the ISS, but it could also be considered the result of the largest international collaboration for a single experiment in space. 1) 2) 3)
The AMS-02 experiment intends to advance knowledge of the universe and the likelihood of a clearer understanding of the universe’s origin. The key science objective is to search for antimatter and of the missing matter in the universe (broadly stated, the AMS goal is to provide first detailed observations of charged particles outside the Earth's atmosphere - in the cosmic void). The search is basically for anti-helium and anti-carbon with a detector sensitivity 104 to 105 times better than current limits. The AMS will help scientists better understand the fundamental issues on the origin and structure of the Universe by observing dark matter, missing matter and antimatter. 4) 5) 6)
• Search for antimatter (antinuclei)
• Search for dark matter (90% of the missing matter in the universe)
• Search for other exotic matter
• Cosmic ray studies (specifically, cosmic ray propagation and confinement time in the Galaxy).
At its heart, the AMS-02 is a cosmic ray detector. Cosmic rays will pass through the AMS-02 and be bent by its magnetic field, generated by a permanent magnet 4,000 times stronger than the Earth’s own magnetic field. Instruments mounted in the AMS-02 will measure the mass, charge, and energy of the particles that pass through it, including the ability to discern matter from antimatter. Located above the Earth’s atmosphere, the AMS will be able to detect high-energy particles that would not make it to the surface.
The design and construction of the AMS-02 Experiment, a state-of-the-art particle physics detector containing a large, cryogenic superfluid helium superconducting magnet (Cryomag), was completed mostly in Europe and Asia. AMS-02 is a DOE organized payload for which NASA is providing integration, delivery, and ISS accommodations. The DOE sponsorship is defined by a signed MOU (Memorandum Of Understanding) of September 20, 1995 that states DOE is responsible for submission of data required for “Interface, integration and safety data” only. NASA is not responsible for mission success and provides minimal avionics support systems.
For the AMS program, NASA officially interfaces with DOE, which is the sponsor for the AMS-02 experiment. DOE in turn sponsors the United States portion of the international AMS Collaboration. NASA/HQ is responsible for the overall NASA management of the AMS program interface activity between NASA and DOE and for overall program management of the NASA AMS program objectives. The Engineering Directorate at NASA/JSC has been delegated responsibility for implementing the AMS project for NASA/HQ. 7) 8)
The flight hardware is referred to as the “AMS Payload” and is comprised of two parts: the “AMS Experiment” provided by the International AMS Collaboration led by the MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology), and the “AMS Payload Integration Hardware (PIH)” provided by NASA/JSC (Johnson Space Center), Houston, TX, with the support of Lockheed Martin Space Operations (LMSO).
A precursor AMS experiment, AMS-01, was initially flown on Shuttle flight STS-91 (Discovery, June 2-12, 1998, the final shuttle-MIR docking). AMS-1 was an AMS prototype (a simplified version of the spectrometer) and was used to test particle physics technology in LEO. The early experiment was particularly helpful in calibrating the instrument. AMS-1 observed millions of helium nuclei, but no antihelium. The success of the 10-day mission allowed to obtain relevant results concerning particle fluxes in near Earth orbit and improved limits on the presence of primary antimatter. 9) 10) 11) 12)
For AMS-01, ten permanent magnets were made:
• Seven magnets to understand the field calculation, leakage and dipole moment.
• Three full-size magnets for 1) space qualification, 2) destructive testing and 3) flight.
In spite of the successful 10-day operation of the AMS-01 prototype, the 3-5 year operation of AMS-02 long-duration mission on the ISS required a major redesign of the spectrometer to guarantee that the mission objectives could be reliably accomplished.
AMS Collaboration: The AMS Collaboration is a partnership of physicists and engineers belonging to Institutes, supported by Funding Agencies whose objective is designing, constructing, testing and operation of the AMS-02 Experiment. The different partners have secured the support of their National/International Funding Agencies to enable them to participate in the AMS Collaboration. They approved the experiment, which includes a precursor flight in June 1998 on the shuttle Discovery (AMS-01) and a flight on the International Space Station (ISS).
In 1997 the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN, Geneva, Switzerland) accepted the AMS experiment as a “Recognized Experiment” (CERN/DG/RB 97-261). In December 2003, CERN and the AMS Collaboration have signed a new MOU with a duration of five years renewable. It foresees the establishment at CERN of the POCC (Payload Operations and Control Center), the SOC (Science Operations Center), assembly and testing areas, office space and secretarial support. 13)
The main objective of the mission with AMS-02 is to contribute to solving the mysteries of dark matter and antimatter. Our present-day knowledge of physics can only explain four percent of the composition of our universe; the remaining 96%, which has been called 'dark matter' and 'dark energy', we know virtually nothing about. Currently, science assumes that dark matter consists of new elementary particles that ensure, for example, that our Sun orbits the center of the Milky Way on a stable path. "We can only determine the validity of this theory by finding evidence for the existence of dark matter." The AMS will also search for antimatter in space with an unprecedented sensitivity. According to Schael, this is one of the most important issues in physics at present. The current hypothesis in astrophysics states that, after the Big Bang, identical amounts of matter and antimatter were created. But no antimatter has been discovered in space yet. "If the AMS were to detect an anti-carbon nucleus, for example, it would indicate that the universe is in fact symmetrical, and that a spatial separation between matter and antimatter took place after the Big Bang."
The AMS detectors will 'see' 2000 particles per second as they fly through the experiment outside the ISS. The experiment will be able to determine, not just the energy, but also the mass and electrical charge of these particles, which are, for example, evidence of the remnants of massive supernovae. "With the AMS, we are creating what is essentially a kind of photograph of this particle flux using all the detectors" (Stefan Schael).
AMS-02 (Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer-02) Experiment
AMS-02 is the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer designed to be mounted and operated on the ISS. The AMS-02 instrument assembly is a cube-shaped structure with a total mass of ~7,000 kg. The spectrometer consists of a huge superconducting magnet and six specialized detectors, and requires 2.4 kW of power @ 28 V.
The experiment has a 10 Gbit/s internal data pipeline and will have a dedicated 2 MB/s connection to ground stations. AMS-02 will gather approximately 200 TB of scientific data during its mission. Four 750 MHz PowerPC computers running Linux will provide the computing power.
An act of Congress in 2008 added another flight to the schedule near the end of the program. Currently scheduled for 2010, this extra flight of the shuttle is going to launch a hunt for antimatter galaxies. 15)
In April 2010, the AMS project decided to switch from a superconducting magnet to a permanent magnet configuration. The design change of the AMS-02 instrument resulted in a launch delay from July 2010 to the fall of 2010 - and eventually to the spring of 2011.
Figure 2: Photo of the AMS-02 assembly in the Shuttle bay (image credit: AMS collaboration)
Launch: The STS-134 with the AMS-02 payload was launched on May 16, 2011. STS-134 (ISS assembly flight ULF6) was the last flight of Space Shuttle Endeavour. The AMS-02 payload was positioned on an external payload attach site of ISS. 17) 18) 19) 20) 21) 22) 23)
Orbit: The near-circular orbit of the ISS is at a nominal altitude of ~400 km with an inclination of 51.6º. The ISS maintains usually a torque equilibrium attitude (TEA) during the microgravity mode of its operation.
The objective of AMS-02 is to perform measurements of cosmic ray spectra of individual elements up to Z< 27 and up to the TeV region and of high energetic gamma-rays up to hundreds of GeV. The goal is to search for the 'missing universe' and to help scientists to understand better the fundamental issues on the origin and structure of the Universe by observing antimatter and ‘dark’ matter. With a magnetic field 4000 times stronger than the magnetic field of Earth, this state-of-the-art particle physics detector will examine directly from space each particle passing through it in a program that is complementary to that of the LHC (Large Hadron Collider).
As a by-product, AMS-02 will gather a lot of other information from cosmic radiation sources on stars and galaxies millions of light years from our home galaxy. Not only astronomers, but also particle physicists, are eagerly waiting for its data.
• Sept. 2013: The 33rd International Conference on Cosmic Rays (ICRC 2013) – The Astroparticle Physics Conference – took place in Rio de Janeiro on 2–9 July, 2013 and provided a high-profile platform for the presentation of a wealth of results from solar and heliospheric physics, through cosmic-ray physics and gamma-ray astronomy to neutrino astronomy and dark-matter physics. A full session was devoted to the presentation of new results from the AMS-02 (Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer). Sponsored by the US Department of Energy and supported financially by the relevant funding and space agencies in Europe and Asia, this experiment was deployed on the ISS (International Space Station) on 19 May 2011. 24)
• July 2013: To date, the AMS-02 detector has collected over 40 billion cosmic ray events. Using the data collected during more than 2 years the AMS Collaboration presented at the ICRC 2013 (International Cosmic Ray Conference) new physics results on: 25) 26)
1) Proton spectrum from 1 GV to 1.8 TV and searches for spectral breaks
2) Helium spectrum from 2 GV to 3 TV and searches for spectral breaks
3) Electron spectrum from 1 GeV to 500 GeV
4) Positron spectrum from 1 GeV to 350 GeV
5) Positron+Electron spectrum from 0.5 Gev to 700 GeV
6) B/C ratio from 0.5 GV to 500 GV
7) Positron fraction and Positron fraction anisotropy.
Most of these results are based on statistical and systematic errors at O(1%).
Figure 3: New results from the first 2 years of AMS (image credit: AMS Collaboration, ICRC 2013)
Figure 4: New results from AMS: Proton flux (image credit: AMS Collaboration, ICRC 2013)
Figure 5: New results from AMS: Proton flux, comparison with past measurements (image credit: AMS Collaboration, ICRC 2013)
Figure 6: New results from AMS: Helium flux (image credit: AMS Collaboration, ICRC 2013)
Figure 7: New results from AMS: Helium flux, comparison with past measurements (image credit: AMS Collaboration, ICRC 2013)
• April 3, 2013: The AMS Collaboration announces the publication of its first physics result in Physical Review Letters. In the initial 18 month period of space operations, from May 19, 2011 to December 10, 2012, AMS-02 analyzed 25 billion primary cosmic ray events. Of these, an unprecedented number, 6.8 million, were unambiguously identified as electrons and their antimatter counterpart, positrons. The 6.8 million particles observed in the energy range 0.5 to 350 GeV are the subject of the precision study reported in this first paper. 27) 28)
Electrons and positrons are identified by the accurate and redundant measurements provided by the various AMS instruments against a large background of protons. Positrons are clearly distinguished from this background through the robust rejection power of AMS of more than one in one million. Currently, the total number of positrons identified by AMS, in excess of 400,000, is the largest number of energetic antimatter particles directly measured and analyzed from space. 29)
AMS has measured the positron fraction (ratio of the positron flux to the combined flux of positrons and electrons) in the energy range 0.5 to 350 GeV. The collaboration observed that from 0.5 to 10 GeV, the fraction decreases with increasing energy. The fraction then increases steadily between 10 GeV to ~250 GeV. Yet the slope (rate of growth) of the positron fraction decreases by an order of magnitude from 20 to 250 GeV. At energies above 250 GeV, the spectrum appears to flatten but to study the behavior above 250 GeV requires more statistics – the data reported represents ~10% of the total expected. The positron fraction spectrum exhibits no structure nor time dependence. The positron to electron ratio shows no anisotropy indicating the energetic positrons are not coming from a preferred direction in space. Together, these features show evidence of a new physics phenomena (Ref. 27).
Figure 8: The positron fraction measured by AMS-02 (image credit: AMS Collaboration, CERN)
Additionally, the energies of these positrons suggest they might have been created when particles of dark matter collided and destroyed each other. The AMS results are consistent with the findings of previous telescopes, like the Fermi and PAMELA gamma-ray instruments, which also saw a similar rise, but Samuel Ting (PI) said the AMS results are more precise.
Figure 9: A comparison of AMS results with recently published measurement (image credit: AMS Collaboration, CERN)
The discovery of of the more than 400,000 positrons, the antimatter equivalent of electrons, is sending shock waves through the scientific community. Where do the positrons come from? The Universe is almost completely devoid of antimatter, so the positron fraction of cosmic ray electrons — as much as 10% — is a little surprising. 30)
One idea is dark matter. Astronomers know that the vast majority of the material Universe is actually made of dark matter rather than ordinary matter. They just don't know what dark matter is. It exerts gravity, but emits no light, which makes it devilishly difficult to study.
A leading theory holds that dark matter is made of a particle called the neutralino. Collisions between neutralinos should produce a large number of high-energy positrons, which the AMS-02 should be able to detect with unprecedented sensitivity.
• May 19. 2012. Today one year ago, AMS-02 began the data taking operations from the ISS. During this first year, AMS-02 registered 17 billion cosmic ray events, smoothly operating in space under extreme thermal conditions. These events have been used to carefully calibrate the particle detectors in order to fully exploit their sensitivity to search for the most rare events. During this period AMS directly measured high energy cosmic rays from space: for the first time electrons of energy exceeding 1 TeV and positrons with energies exceeding 200 GeV have been recorded before entering the atmosphere. 31) 32)
Figure 10: Schematic view of high energy electrons and positrons observed by AMS-02 (AMS collaboration, Ref. 31)
• In April 2012, AMS-02 is 11 months in orbit since its installation on the ISS. AMS-02 is smoothly collecting Cosmic Rays with energies ranging from 100’s of MeV to a several TeV: event number 14.000.000.000 (14 billion) was recorded on March 19, 2012. 33)
• In June 2011, AMS-02 is detecting particles smoothly and continuously: at a rate of about 50 million of cosmic rays/day it has already taken more than one billion of events! While the spectrometer was happily collecting particles in space, the AMS-02 team managed to transfer the POCC (Payload Operation Control Center) from NASA/JSC, Houston to a new building at CERN, Geneva, Switzerland. Since June 27, 2011, AMS-02 is controlled from the newly built POCC at CERN. 34)
• On June 1, 2011, the space shuttle Endeavour landed safely in Cape Canaveral, FLA (touchdown at 6:35 GMT) for the last time, ending the 16-day journey of STS-34 — and beginning its retirement from now on. 35) 36)
• On May 19, 2011, the AMS-02 detectors were activated and started operating smoothly and nominally since the beginnng of its life on ISS. The first event of AMS-02 on the same day was a 20 GeV electron while the second was a 42 GeV Carbon nucleus. The data of AMS-02 is being sent to the POCC (Payload Operation Control Center) at NASA/JSC in Houston, TX. 37)
• On May 19, 2011, the AMS-02 was anchored to the starboard truss of the ISS - the largest and most complex scientific instrument of the ISS. The AMS-02 will sift ~10,000 cosmic-ray hits every minute, looking for nature’s best-kept particle secrets. By collecting and measuring vast numbers of cosmic rays and their energies, particle physicists hope to understand more about how and where they are born. 38) 39) 40)
Figure 11: Photo of the AMS-02 assembly (left foreground) after installation on the starboard truss of the ISS (image credit: NASA)
Figure 12: Photo of the docked Space Shuttle Endeavour through a fish-eye lens (image credit: NASA)
Legend to Figure 12: A fish-eye lens attached to an electronic still camera was used to capture this image of NASA astronaut Michael Fincke (top center) during the fourth EVA of the STS-134 mission as construction and maintenance continue on the International Space Station. The docked space shuttle Endeavour is visible at left. The blackness of space and Earth's horizon provide the backdrop for the scene.
Figure 13: Photo of the installed AMS-02 with astronauts Andrew Feustel (right) and Greg Chamitoff (left middle on the truss) during a 6 hr 19 min EVA on May 20, 2011, (image credit: NASA, ESA, Ref. 36)
AMS-02 Instrumentation (main components - description prior to the permanent magnet swap):
Note: The description of AMS-02 with the SCM (Superconducting Magnet) configuration is kept in this file for better reference and for the description of those components (STD, TOF, TRD, RICH, and ECAL) which remained unchanged despite the swap to a permanent magnet.
The AMS-02 detector is a large acceptance (~0.5 m2 sr) spaceborne magnetic spectrometer designed to perform precise measurements of charged cosmic ray fluxes in a wide energy range (in the rigidity range from 0.5 GeV to 4 TeV). The main components of the detector are shown in Figures 14 and 15: 41) 42) 43) 44) 45) 46) 47) 48)
• A silicon tracker detector (STD) made of 8 double-sided silicon sensor layers, 6 of them contained inside the magnet, will measure the charged particle bending.
• A time of flight system (TOF) consisting of 2 double planes of scintillator counters which is able to reach a precision in the time of around 120 ps
• The anticoincidence counters (ACC) which ensure that only particles passing through the magnet aperture will be accepted.
• A transition radiation detector (TRD) which detects the transition radiation light produced by ultra-relativistic particles in a set of polypropylene fiber radiators by means of 5248 straw tubes operated at high voltage with a mixture of Xe and CO2.
• A ring imaging Cherenkov counter (RICH) will measure the velocity of relativistic particles from its Cherenkov cone opening angle. The Cherenkov radiator consists of a set of aerogel and NaF tiles, while the detection plane is instrumented with 680 R7600-M16 multianode Hamamatsu PMTs (Photomultiplier Tubes).
• An electromagnetic calorimeter (ECAL) that consists of layers of lead foils with glued scintillating fibers resulting into a total radiation depth of 17 Xo for shower development. Note: The Electromagnetic Calorimeter is also abbreviated as EMC.
• A cryogenic superconducting magnet (Cryomag) consisting of an arrangement of 2 main dipole coils and 12 racetrack coils designed to give the maximum field in the perpendicular direction, while minimizing the stray field outside the magnet. The magnetic flux density at the geometric centre of the system is 0.86 TeV.
• A system of two star trackers AST (AMICA Star Tracker) to allow the precise reconstruction of the direction of arrival of high energy gamma rays reconstructed in the detector. The AMICA (Astro Mapper for Instruments Check of Attitude) on AMS-02 is responsible for providing real-time information that is going to be used off-line for compensating the large uncertainties in the ISS flight attitude and the structural degrees of freedom. AST is an evolution of an existing pointing/tracking system flown three times on the Space Shuttle as part of the UVSTAR telescope. 49) 50)
Figure 14: Schematic view of the AMS-02 spectrometer for the ISS (image credit: AMS collaboration)
Figure 15: Exploded view of the AMS-02 subdetectors (image credit: AMS collaboration)
The experimental approach of the AMS-02 mission is to look for antimatter in cosmic rays above the atmosphere (because antimatter annihilates in the atmosphere). The particle identification of cosmic rays relies on precise measurements of the rigidity, velocity, energy and electric charge.
The AMS-02 is an unpressurized, full truss mounted payload on the ISS that will utilize a Cryomag with planes of detectors above, inside and below the magnet. Electrically charged particles that pass through the magnetic field will curve. Charged particles made of matter will curve one way, and those of antimatter will curve the opposite way. The positions of the charged particles will be electronically recorded.
The large data sample collected after the experiment long exposure will allow a sensitive search for antimatter and dark matter signatures in cosmic rays as well as astrophysics studies regarding cosmic ray production, acceleration and propagation in the Galaxy.
Figure 16: The basic idea of the AMS-02 magnetic spectrometer measurement concept (image credit: MIT)
STD (Silicon Tracker Detector):
The STD, also referred to as the “silicon tracker”, is the hyper-accurate center of AMS. The STD measures the particle's momentum in the strong magnetic (B) field of the AMS. It detects the trajectory of the incoming particles and identifies the magnitude and polarity of the particles’ electrical charge (the higher the particle's momentum, the straighter the arc).
STD consists of 2300 double-sided silicon micro-strip sensors arranged in eight circular layers perpendicular to the magnet axis. STD provides a position resolution of 8.5 µm (30 µm) in the bending (non-bending) plane. The total instrumented surface area is 6.45 m2 with 196 k readout channels (Ref. 41). A laser alignment system is being used to ensure the long term stability of the resolution with position accuracy of better than 4 µm.
Figure 17: Two views of the Silicon Tracker, the right image shows the curvature of a cosmic ray track in the B field (image credit: AMS collaboration)
The 8 layers of silicon are arranged in 5 thin support planes. The external ones are equipped with a single silicon layer whereas the central ones, located inside the magnet volume, mount one silicon layer on each side. The presence of the superconducting magnet requires an active cooling system to evacuate the heat generated by the STD front-end electronics. A laser system, which provides optically generated signals in the 8 STD layers, will monitor the system alignment throughout the mission.
The bending power provided by the magnet and the precise particle trajectory measurements in the STD provide a resolution in the particle rigidity measurement (p/Z) of 1.5% at 10 GeV and a maximum detectable rigidity above 1 TeV for protons. In addition, the wide dynamic range of the tracker readout electronics provides charge separation of nuclei up to Z=26 (by dE/dx measurements). 51) 52)
The TOF Scintillator produces flashes of light when struck by particles or photons. The TOF serves as the fast trigger for the experiment. When an incoming particle crosses the bore of the cryo magnet, the TOF’s resolution is sufficient to distinguish between upward and downward traveling particles (120 ps TOF resolution).
The four TOF detector planes are made of scintillator material. This detector measures the transit time of particles between two layers.
Figure 18: Schematic of TOF measurements (image credit: AMS collaboration)
ACC (Anti Coincidence Counter):
The ACC detects and identifies the particles entering or exiting through the side or that have not cleanly traversed the STD. The ACC provides a means of rejecting particles that may confuse the charge determination of the incoming particles that are of interest. 53) 54) 55) 56)
The ACC of AMS-02 surrounds the silicon tracker (STD) and can be used as a veto for the trigger decision made by the TOF. This is important for rejecting events with particles entering the detector from the side or with particles from secondary interactions inside the detector which could distort the charge measurement. To improve existing upper limits on antihelium an inefficiency of the ACC smaller than 10-4 is needed according to MC simulations. The inefficiency is the ratio of missed to the total number of particle tracks crossing the ACC.
A further important task of the ACC is to reduce the trigger rate during periods of very large flux activity, e.g. in the SAA (South Atlantic Anomaly). For this reason, it is important to use a detector with a fast response.
The ACC features a modular design, the cylinder has a diameter of 1.1 m and a height of 0.83 m and is made out of 16 scintillation panels (Bicron BC-414) with a thickness of 8 mm. The ultraviolet scintillation light through ionization losses of charged particles is absorbed by WLS (Wavelength Shifting Fibers) which are embedded into the panels. The WLS fibers are coupled to clear fiber cables for the final light transport to the photomultiplier tubes (Hamamatsu R5946).
A set of two panels is being read out by the same two photomultipliers, one on top and one on the bottom, via clear fiber cables (Y-shape) in order to have redundancy and to save mass (Figure 19, lower part). The slot between two panels is realized with tongue and groove and is crucial for the determination of the inefficiency because of less scintillator material and a smaller active (WLS) to passive (scintillator) material ratio.
The ACC power consumption is limited to 800 mW and the total mass of 54 kg.
Figure 19: The upper figure shows the ACC after integration (left), and the principle of component arrangement (right), the lower figure shows the ACC working principle (image credit: AMS Collaboration)
RICH (Ring-Imaging Cherenkov Detector):
RICH is used to measure the velocity of the charged cosmic particles that traverse the AMS-02. The RICH is able to determine the velocity of charged particles by measuring the vertex angle of the cone of Cherenkov light. The Cherenkov light is emitted as the particle passes through a tile of silica aerogel or sodium fluoride. The light guide material in the Unit Cell assembly is Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA), (PlexiglasTM). RICH measures the Cherenkov light using photomultiplier tubes.
RICH is a proximity focusing device with a dual radiator configuration on top made of 92 aerogel tiles of 25 mm thickness; the refractive index is 1.050. In addition, there are sodium fluoride (NaF) tiles with a thickness of 5 mm covering an area of 34 cm x 34 cm. The NaF placement prevents the loss of photons in the hole existing in the center of the readout plane (64 cm x 64 cm), in front of the ECAL device located below. 57) 58)
Figure 20: Schematic view of the RICH instrument (image credit: AMS collaboration)
ECAL (Electromagnetic Calorimeter):
The ECAL takes care of the electromagnetic particle identification, determining the electron energy with a resolution of 3% at 100 GeV. The ECAL measures the energy of electrons, positrons, and gamma rays up to 1 TeV and the direction with an angular resolution around 1º. The instrument has been constructed by an Annecy (France), Beijing (China) and Pisa-Sienna (Italy) collaboration team. 59) 60) 61)
ECAL is an imaging calorimeter consisting of 9 modules made of layers of lead and scintillating fibers. Its function is to completely stop particles. Each module has a 648 mm x 648 mm section and is 18 mm in depth, which corresponds to 1.8 radiation lengths. In two successive modules the fibers are rotated by 90º and follow in the x or y direction. The fibers of a module are being read only at one end of the PMT (Photomultiplier Tube) of Hamamatsu (R7600-00-M4) and placed alternatively on each side. One PMT consists of 4 independent pixels. In this way, the elementary cell of the calorimeter has the size of 648 mm x 9 mm in the x-y directions and 9 mm in the z direction.
Figure 21: ECAL inside the supporting structure (image credit: AMS collaboration)
The major challenge of the PMT and for its front-end electronics is related to the very large dynamic range of the light pulses created in the fibers by cosmic rays. The signal in the PMT ranges from a few photo-electrons for MIP (Minimum Ionizing Particles) to ~ 105 photo-electrons for electromagnetic showers corresponding to very high energy particles (for instance an electron of 1 TeV energy). The power consumption for all ECAL electronics is limited to 100 W.
The ECAL measurement requirements call for:
• .Precise measurement of the EM (Electromagnetic) shower energy from 1 GeV to few TeV
• 3D imaging of the EM and hadronic showers development. EM reconstruction of the shower direction and impact point angular resolution < 1º @ E > 50 GeV
• e/h discrimination from 1 GeV to 1 TeV (rejection power ~ 103)
• Stand-alone γ-trigger: gamma efficiency > 90% above 2 GeV.
Figure 22: Schematic view of the ECAL instrumentation (image credit: AMS collaboration)
The particle identification is done through its electric charge and its mass. The charge is determined by a combined measurement of the deposited energy in the TOF and STD planes and by the Cherenkov light detected in the RICH from Z=1 to Z ≤ 26 with very small charge confusion.
TRD (Transition Radiation Detector):
Transition radiation (TR) consists of soft x-rays which are emitted when charged particles traverse the boundary between two media with different dielectric constants. In the momentum range from 10 to 300 GeV/c, light particles such as electrons and positrons have much higher probability of emitting TR photons than heavy particles such as protons and antiprotons.
The objective of TRD is to distinguish an e+ or p- signal (electron or positron spectra) reducing the p+ or e- background by a rejection factor 10-3 to 10-2 in an energy range from 10-300 GeV. This will be used in conjunction with an electromagnetic calorimeter (ECAL) to provide overall p+rejection of 10-6 at 90% e+ efficiency. TRD identifies particles in addition to the ECAL. 62) 63) 64) 65) 66)
The detector consists of 20 layers of 6 mm diameter straw tubes alternating with 20 mm layers of polyethylene/polypropylene fleece radiator. The tubes are filled with a 80% / 20% mixture of Xe / CO2 at 1.0 bar absolute from a recirculating gas system designed to operate > 3 years in space. The layers are mounted to 0.1 mm precision in a stable carbon fiber composite/aluminum honeycomb octagonal mechanical support. The conical octagon structure has a width from 1.5 m at the bottom to 2.2 m at the top.
In the TRD design, the upper and lower four layers of tubes run in the x direction (oriented parallel to the magnetic field), the middle 12 layers run in the perpendicular y direction, to provide tracking in the bending and non-bending directions (3D tracking) of the 0.8 T superconducting magnet as well as particle identification.
Figure 23: Schematic view of the conical octagon with 328 modules in 20 layers (image credit: AMS Collaboration)
The straw tubes are built as modules of 16 tubes. The modules are arranged in the conical octagon structure, such that the upper and lower 4 layers of tubes run along the B-field direction and the 12 central layers in the perpendicular direction. In all, there are 328 modules, for a total of 5248 straws. The length of the straw modules varies from 0.8 m to 2.0 m. The wall material of the straws is a 72 µm kapton foil and the sense wires are 30 µm gold plated tungsten.
Figure 24: Complete TRD on top of upper magnet flange (image credit: AMS Collaboration)
The DAQ (Data Acquisition) system of the TRD is divided in two parts: The front end electronics which are mounted on the walls of the detector, and the first level of data acquisition which is hosted in two identical crates. The digitization of the signals from the straw tubes is done in the front end electronics. The crates hold the power supplies, the boards which collect and compress the data and the control of the whole TRD DAQ system.
Cryogenic superconducting magnet:
In AMS-02, the charged particle bending, provided by a superconducting magnet, is measured by a silicon tracker. The particle time of flight (TOF), and hence its velocity, is determined by a set of scintillation counter hodoscopes. Additional particle identification capabilities are provided by a TRD (Transition Radiation Detector), a RICH (Ring imaging Cherenkov Detector) and an ECAL (Electromagnetic Calorimeter). Finally, a shell of ACC (Anti Coincidence Counters), covering the inner surface of the magnet, provides a veto for non-fiducial particle trajectories.
The main goal of the superconducting magnet is to extend the energy range of particle and nuclei measurements to the multi-TeV region. The superconducting magnet was developed and built by Scientific Magnetics Ltd. (former Space Cryomagnetics Ltd.), Oxford, UK The cryogenic superconducting magnet consists of an arrangement of 2 main dipole coils and 12 racetrack coils, a superfluid helium vessel and a cryogenic system, all enclosed in an aluminum vacuum tank which serves also as the primary structural support of the experiment.
Supporting electronics, valves and cabling are located outside the vacuum tank. The vacuum tank itself has a toroidal shape with inner diameter 1.1 m, outer diameter 2.7 m and length of the central cylinder surrounding the STD 0.9 m. The geometry of the superconducting magnet defines the acceptance of the detector (0.5 m2 sr). 67) 68)
The magnet operates at a temperature of 1.8 K, cooled by means of the 2500 l of superfluid helium stored in the vessel. The higher latent heat and density of liquid 4He in its superfluid phase increases the total cooling capacity for a fixed helium tank volume. Moreover, the huge thermal conductivity of superfluid helium avoids significant temperature gradients. In zero gravity operation, this prevents temperature stratification which could result in unacceptable gradients across the magnet cold mass. Because of parasitic heat loads, the helium will gradually boil away throughout the lifetime of the experiment.
The dipole coils generate the magnetic field and the return coils control the stray field. The cryo-magnet design ensures an intense and quite uniform field perpendicular to the vertical axis, a negligible dipole moment and the fulfillment of NASA safety regulations concerning fringe magnetic fields on the ISS (Ref. 41).
Figure 25: Photo of the AMS-02 superconducting magnet (image credit: AMS collaboration)
Test preparations of AMS-02:
• Beam test at CERN (Feb. 4-6, 2010): The AMS-02 instrument was integrated at the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) in Geneva, Switzerland. The first part of the tests was also conducted at CERN, when the detector was put through its paces using a proton beam from CERN’s Super Proton Synchrotron accelerator to check its momentum resolution and its ability to measure particle curvature and momentum.
• Thermal vacuum and electromagnetic compatibility tests: In mid-February 2010, the AMS-02 instrument assembly arrived at ESA/ESTEC in Noordwijk, The Netherlands. The objective is to subject the AMS-02 to final qualification tests, in particular the overall thermal vacuum test. The LSS (Large Space Simulator) at ESTEC uses a huge vacuum chamber, complete with its own bright 'Sun' and walls cooled by liquid helium, to reproduce closely the conditions of space, while various shakers, acoustic chambers and electromagnetic tests are used to mimic conditions during launch and operation in space.
• Interface verification testing at KSC: Once the extensive testing is complete, AMS-02 will leave ESTEC at the end of May on a special US Air Force flight to KSC (Kennedy Space Center) in Florida.
• End-to-end testing on the launch pad: Operation centers at KSC and JSC (Johnson Space Center), Houston.
• Installation, activation and full operations on the Space Station ISS: Operations at JSC (~3 months), then shift to CERN
Figure 26: AMS-02 during integration activities at the CERN facility in Geneva (image credit: AMS collaboration)
Figure 27: Cutaway view of the AMS-02 instrumentation and components configured for the ISS (image credit: AMS collaboration)
• AMS-02 at ESA/ESTEC in Noordwijk: 69)
In March 2010, the AMS-02 payload was tested in the Maxwell Test Chamber at ESA/ESTEC to confirm its electromagnetic compatibility with the Shuttle and ISS systems. This demonstration test was necessary because the powerful magnet bends the path of incoming charged particles on their way through a stack of detectors.
The initial version of the magnet was so powerful, in fact, that it relied on superfluid helium to achieve superconducting temperatures, down to just 1.8º C above absolute zero.
Next came thermal-vacuum testing in ESA's the LSS (Large Space Simulator), to prove the thermal performance of all AMS-02 subsystems in space conditions.
AMS-02 Instrumentation (description after the change to a Permanent Magnet):
The planned extension of ISS operations from 2015 to 2020 and possibly to 2028 has a significant impact on the scientific perspectives of the AMS-02 experiment, which, being designed to search for rare events and to measure weak signals, could gain in sensitivity by a longer data taking in space. Hence, the AMS-02 will fly in the Permanent Magnet (PM) configuration. The SCM (Superconducting Magnet) version would not have had an endurance comparable to the extended lifetime of the ISS. (Ref. 1). 70) 71) 72)
The decision, made in the spring of 2010 - operating the ISS until at least 2020, made again the Permanent Magnet a very interesting option, and a consensus within the AMS Collaboration and NASA was quickly reached.
The AMS-02 PM configuration is technically simpler to operate with respect to the SCM one. There is no need for the Helium tank, for any cryogenic device, etc. There is also some gain in weight and the safety requirements are less stringent. Since the AMS-02 subsystems were originally designed to support both the PM and the SCM options, the two vacuum cases structures are mechanically identical and integration is very similar.
The AMS-02 PM configuration is technically simpler to operate with respect to the SCM one. There is no need for the Helium tank, for any cryogenic device, etc. There is also some gain in weight and the safety requirements are less stringent. Since the AMS-02 subsystems were originally designed to support both the PM and the SCM options, the two vacuum cases structures are mechanically identical and integration is very similar.
Figure 28: Comparison of the two AMS-02 designs, SCM (left) and PM (right), image credit: AMS collaboration
In the new PM design, the particles and anti-particles are bent by magnetic fields in opposite directions. A direct measurement of the curvature direction allows the separation between matter/antimatter (left-positive, right-negative). From an experimental point of view is straightforward to say that: the larger is the bending of the particle trajectory, the simpler is the determination of the sign of the curvature.
The trade off in using the PM is the fact that the magnetic field is 5 times weaker than the SCM one. This means that charged particles of the same energy (as the two depicted in the previous figure) are bent less by the PM field. This would limit the matter-to-antimatter separation to lower energies using the PM instead of the SCM.
To cope with this fact, an optimization of the geometry of the AMS STD (Silicon Tracker Detector) can be implemented. The basic idea is to extend the lever arm of the tracking measurement adding measurements above and below AMS-02. With a bigger lever arm also tiny angular deviation of the particle in the magnetic field can be appreciated. With such an “extended” STD, smaller curvatures can be measured. With this technique the project can recover the full sensitivity of AMS-02 on matter-antimatter separation.
An approximate formula for the relative error (the percentage of error) on the rigidity evaluation in the STD, ΔR/R, is given in Figure 28. The term ΔR/R is considered the percentage of error on the curvature determination. When ΔR/R become 100% the curvature becomes so tiny that we cannot separate anymore positive from negative tracks. In both formulas ΔR/R increases – corresponding to a worse accuracy on curvature determination – if the magnetic field is reduced. We can improve the resolution extending the lever arm (L).
The optimization of the STD is obtained adding 2 more planes at the beginning and at the end of the detector, thus extending the lever arm from ~ 1 m to ~ 4 m. These two planes are built reshuffling some “ladders” already existing on the STD, then no new electronics or Silicon ladders are needed.
Figure 29: Illustration of the silicon tracker layers in the new design (right), image credit: AMS collaboration
Figure 30: The rigidity resolution for the two AMS-02 magnetic designs (image credit: AMS collaboration)
Legend to Figure 30: The green line is the difference between the blue (PM) and red (SCM) resolutions. At high energies the PM and SCM accuracies are equivalent; at low energies the difference in accuracy is only 10% using 9 tracker planes.
Expected performances of the new design:
As a side effect of the extension of the lever arm, the number of cosmic-rays per second passing through the tracking volume is reduced. This is because longer cylinders – with the same diameter – have narrower angular field-of-views. However the number of CRs (Cosmic Rays) collected in 10 years in the PM scenario is greater than the number of CRs that could be collected in the SCM scenario. The larger number of particles collected increases the probability of discovery very rare events as traces of primordial antimatter or products of Dark Matter annihilation.
As an example the number of positrons collected in the PM configuration is expected to be a factor 2 to 6 greater to the SCM configuration, depending on the energy. Positrons are an important rare component of cosmic-rays. They could be an important marker of the Dark Matter indirect search.
Indeed, an important AMS-02 research topic regards the measurement of positron-to-electron ratio. PAMELA (Payload for AntiMatter Exploration and Light-nuclei Astrophysics) on Resurs-DK1 (launch June 15, 2006) has clearly pointed out an excess of positrons at high energies: a similar effect was previously measured with larger statistical uncertainties by HEAT and AMS-01. The debate on the nature of such an excess is still going on. One possible hypothesis is that it is resulting from Dark Matter (DM) annihilation producing electrons and positrons in the final state.
DM particles are everywhere and interact very weakly with normal matter. Direct detection is pursued at underground laboratories and is very difficult. In the galaxy DM particles could interact and sometime annihilate. Since DM is expected to have a large mass, the energy released in these annihilations is quite large. This energy can be converted in pairs of ordinary matter-antimatter particles (electron-positron, proton-antiproton) having quite an high energy. The excess of positrons in the spectrum seen in PAMELA data could then be explained considering that high energy positrons could be produced by DM annihilations taking place in our galaxy.
From the experimental point of view, in AMS-02 the identification of electrons and positrons against the large background of protons will be done using the TRD (Transition Radiation Detector) and ECAL (Electromagnetic CALorimeter). The new STD configuration will match the acceptance of ECAL, so that all particles passing trough the STD, are also measured by the ECAL maximizing the AMS-02 acceptance and identification power for electrons and positrons.
Figure 31: Photo of the AMS-2 assembly (image credit: AMS Collaboration)
Figure 32: AMS-02 configuration and major components after the change to a permanent magnet (AMS Collaboration)
Last beam test at CERN:
The new AMS-02 design/development with the permanent magnet was completed in July 2010 and a beam test of the new configuration was conducted at CERN in the period August 9-20, 2010. The test involved systematic calibration using high energy protons, positrons, electrons and pions. The CERN accelerator is able to provide particles and antiparticles up to 400 GeV/c2 of energy. These particles are used to align the various parts of the tracking system to microns level accuracy and to test the particle identification capability of the experiment. Literally thousands of different test beam incident angles and positions have been selected to align the geometry and measure the response of the detectors, collecting hundreds of million of particles which will be later analyzed to define the calibration constants of the experiment, that are all the numerical parameters needed to have accurate expressed values from the different instruments. 73)
After final testing at ESA/ESTEC in Noordwijk, the Netherlands, the AMS-02 assembly was delivered to the Kennedy Space Center (KSC) in Florida on August 26, 2010. 74)
Figure 33: AMS-02 loaded onto the US Air Force C-5 Galaxy aircraft (image credit: ESA)
AMS-02 PIH (Payload Integration Hardware)
The PIH of NASA/JSC provides the required structural, electrical, and C&DH (Command and Data Handling) interfaces between the components of the AMS-02 experiment and the STS for transfer to and from orbit, and the ISS during its on-orbit operational lifetime (Ref. 8). 75)
The USS-02 (Unique Support Structure) is used to support the AMS-02 magnet and detectors and to interface the entire AMS-02 Experiment with the Space Shuttle Orbiter and ISS. The Vacuum Case is an integral part of the USS-02. The USS-02 is comprised of the following five subassemblies: 1) Upper USS-02 Assembly, 2) Vacuum Case Assembly, 3) Lower USS-02 Assembly, 4) Keel Assembly, and 5) passive Payload Attach System (PAS) Assembly/Umbilical Mechanism Assembly (UMA). The USS-02 mechanically attaches to the Space Shuttle Orbiter with four longeron trunnions and one keel trunnion. The AMS-02 payload mechanically attaches to the ISS via the PAS Assembly.
Several AMS-02 experiment components are mounted to the USS-02. These components include: the Transition Radiation Detector (TRD), Time of Flight Scintillator Counters (TOF), Ring Imaging Cherenkov Counter (RICH), Electromagnetic Calorimeter (ECAL), TRD gas supply system, Main Crates/Radiators, RICH electronics boxes, ECAL electronics boxes, Cryomagnet Avionics Box (CAB), Cryomag rectifiers, electrical cables and components of the Thermal Control System (TCS).
In addition, the following hardware, provided by the Space Shuttle Program, will be attached to the USS-02. It includes a Flight Releasable Grapple Fixture (FRGF) and a Remotely Operated Electrical Umbilical (ROEU) Payload Disconnect Assembly (PDA). The ISS Program provided hardware that will be attached to the USS-02 includes a Power Video Grapple Fixture (PVGF), a passive Umbilical Mechanism Assembly (UMA), an External Berthing Camera System (EBCS), a Worksite Interface Fixture (WIF), Side Mount, and nine EVA Handrails.
Figure 34: USS-02 with PAS (Passive Payload Attach System), image credit: NASA/JSC)
Figure 35: Overview of the PIH system (image credit: NASA/JSC)
AMS-02 interfaces to the ISS
• The LRDL communications is based on the MIL-STD-1553B dual serial bus. Monitoring data pass over the bus, through ISS for transmission on the Ku-band via the TDRS satellites to the ground, through NASA centers and the Internet to the AMS-02 POCC (Payload Operations and Control Center) in real time. The available date rate is ~ 10 kbit/s with a duty cycle of 55 - 90%. 10 byte/s is transmitted continuously. The LRDL is also the command path from the POCC to AMS-02. At most one 120 byte command is allowed each second.
• The HRDL communications is based on an ISS specific implementation of the TAXI protocol over fiber optic cables operating at 125 Mbit/s. This data stream contains the event data and a copy of the monitoring data. Within ISS the data is transmitted to the ACOP (AMS Crew Operations Post), where it is archived for eventual retrieval by the shuttle. ACOP also provides crew access to the monitoring data.
The AMS-02 payload and monitoring data will be collected in the crew quarters of ISS by a dedicated computer, referred to as ACOP (AMS Crew Operation Post).The electronics for the readout of subdetectors is being build based on a total of 650 microprocessors (2-to-4 fold redundant design). The data is archived at ACOP for eventual retrieval by the shuttle. ACOP also provides crew access to the monitoring data (Ref. 77).
Figure 36: C&DH interfaces between the AMS-02 payload and the ISS (image credit: NASA)
When the Ku-band is available, data can be replayed from ACOP or streamed live from the experiment to the POCC (Payload Operations Control Center) and to the AMS-02 science operations center. AMS-02 is allocated an orbital average of 2 Mbit/s in downlink. To allow the contingency loading of software into the experiment and as a backup command path, data can be transmitted over the HRDL from ACOP to AMS-02.
Figure 37: Mounting location of the AMS-02 on the ISS structure (image credit: AMS collaboration)
Figure 38: Computer animation of the AMS-02 on the ISS (image credit: AMS collaboration)
AMS-02 Ground Segment
The AMS-02 payload data is communicated to the ground via the White Sands Facility to the GSC (Ground Support Computers) and POIC (Payload Operation Integration Center), both located at NASA/MSFC (Marshall Space Flight Center); Figures 39 and 40.
Figure 39: Functional overview of the AMS-02 ground segment elements (image credit: AMS Collaboration)
For AMS-02, the ground computing system is conceptually divided into AMS Ground Centers: 79)
• GSC (Ground Support Computers) at NASA/MSFC Huntsville AL: Reception of monitoring and science data from POIC; buffer science, housekeeping and NASA ancillary data for transmission to the POCC. Two redundant GSC units will be running at MSFC.
• POCC (Payload Operations and Control Center): where AMS operations take place, including commanding, storage and analysis of housekeeping data and partial science data analysis for rapid quality control and feedback.
• SOC (Science Operations Center): receives and stores all AMS science and housekeeping data, as well as ancillary data from NASA, ensures full science data reconstruction, calibration and alignment; archives all data and keeps data available for physics analysis.
• RC (Regional Centers) contain analysis facilities to support physicists from geographically close AMS universities and laboratories, RC also provide access to the AMS-02 data for visualization, detector verification studies and status of data processing. In addition, RC constitute the processing sites for the AMS-02 Monte Carlo production as well as AMS-02 Data reproductions.
The POCC and SOC are being set up in the basement of building 892 (CERN- Prevessin), close to the AMS-02 detector integration facility. A backup POCC will be temporarily moved to KSC together with the detector itself for the pre-flight tests, then to JSC for the detector activation period. After successful installation on ISS and running-in of the experiment for 2-3 months, the backup POCC at JSC will be cold spared and the CERN POCC will take over. The data transmission and operations issues during JSC phase of the AMS-02 ISS mission were discussed (Ref. 78).
Figure 41: Final version of the AMS-02 data flow (image credit: AMS Collaboration)
The raw data volume transmitted from ISS to ground is estimated to be of 4 Mbit/s on average. In addition to the science data, 1 kbit/s of health and status data are received in real time. The data are buffered at POIC and transmitted in real time to POCC and SOC.
The public internet is being used for all data transmissions between NASA/MSFC and the various AMS-02 centers on a global scale.
1) Samuel Ting, “Status of the AMS Experiment,” 22nd ECRS (European Cosmic Ray Symposium), Turku, Finland, Aug. 3-6, 2010, URL: http://ecrs2010.utu.fi/done/presentations/EDU1/1A_PL_Tuesday/1_Ting.pdf
3) “Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer - 02 (AMS-02),” NASA Fact Sheet, URL: http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/research/experiments/AMS-02.html
4) C. H. Chung, S. Fopp, Th. Kirn, W. Karpinski, K. Lübelsmeyer, S. Schael, A. Schultz von Dratzig, G. Schwering, Th. Siedenburg, R. Siedling, W. Wallraff, M. Wlochal, H.-B. Broeker, V. Commichau, G. Fluegge, K. Hangarter, J. Madsen, H. Boer Rookhuizen, C. Snippe, B. Verlaat, C. Adloff, F. Cadoux, G. Coignet, L. Girard, C. Goy, R. Hermel, R. Kossakowski , J. Pochon, S. Rosier-Lees, J.-P. Vialle, A. Pevsner, S.B. Bai, Y.Q. Feng, F. Gao, X.J. Han, K. Luo, F.X. Shen, R.H. Wei, S.H. Xiang, L.J. Xu, S. Yang, Z.H. Zhu, Y.M. Dai, N.H. Song, Q.L. Wang, Y.J. Yu, G.M. Chen, H.S. Chen, Z.H. Li, Y.S. Lu, X.W. Tang, C.G. Yang, M. Yang, Z.Q. Yu, H.L. Zhuang, M. Basile, V. Bindi, D. Casadei, F. Cindolo, A. Contin, A. Evangelista, S. Finelli, F. Giovacchini, C. Guandalini, G. Laurenti, G. Levi, M. Lolli, R. Martelli, L. Quadrani, F. Palmonari, G. Sartorelli, C. Sbarra, A. Zichichi), A. Zucchini, N. Dinu, M. Ionica, R. Ionica, F. Manolescu, O. Maris, A. Mihul, R. Becker, U. Becker, P. Berges, J. D. Burger, X. D. Cai, M. Capell, G. Carosi, V. Choutko, B. Demirkoz, P. Dennett, F. J. Eppling, P. H. Fisher, A. Klimentov, A. Koulemzine, A. Kounine, V. Koutsenko, A. Lebedev, B. Monreal, A. Rozhkov, K. Scholberg, Samuel C. C. Ting, S. M. Ting, M. Steuer, S. Xiao, S. D. Xu, M. Vergain, Y. Wang, X. Z. Wang, Y. H. Chang, C. H. Lin, A. Malinine, E.-S. Seo, R. Sagdeev, S. Harrison, R. McMahon, S. Milward, R. Stafford-Allen, H. Ahmed, C. H. Chung, G. N. Kim, M. W. Lee, W. H. Park, J. W. Shin, D. Son, K. W. Sung, N. Tasneem, A. A. M. Delil, A. Pauw, G. van Donk, J. van Es, A. A. Woering, G. Castellini, J. Trümper, J. Allaby, Ph. Azzarello, Ph. Bouvier, M. Bourquin, E. Cortina, D. Haas, H. Hakobyan, C. Lechanoine-Leluc, S. Natale, M. Paniccia, E. Perrin, M. Pohl, D. Rapin, C.M. Ting, M. Willenbrock, S. Breon, B. Baret, A. Barrau, G. Boudoul, M. Buénerd, L. Derome, K. Protasov, M. Vargas-Trevino, O. Véziant, K. H. Guo, Z. H. He, Y. H. Huang, X. H. Jiang, T. X. Li , S. S. Lu, J. Q. Ni, X. M. Qi, S. J. Yu, N. S. Xu, C. Balasubramanian, J. Bates, D. Blanchard, K. Bollweg, C. Clark, M. Fohey, R. Harold, L. Hill, W. Hungerford, T. Martin, P. Mott, P. Nemeth, S. Porter, R. Sanchez, T. Tinsler, C. Tutt, C.-R. Chen, C. Hsiao, L. C. Lee, J.-R. Tsai, L. Cheng, Z. Y. Guo, K. Li, Z. T. Liang, T. Luan, L. Q. Wang, W. de Boer, F. Hauler, L. Jungermann, C. Sander, M. Schmanau, V. Zhukov, A. Mujunen, J. Ritakari, F. Barao, G. Barreira, M. Pimenta, P. Goncalves, L. Arruda, R. Pereira, Y.-J. Fanchiang, H. Jinchi, Y.-T. Ting, M. Aguilar-Benítez, J. Alcaraz, J. Berdugo, J. Casaus, J. De Vicente, C. Díaz, L. García-Tabarés, E. Lanciotti, G. Martínez, C. Palomares, C. Maña, J. Marín, M. Molla, E. Sanchez, S. Sanz, I. Sevilla, F. Toral, A. Torrento, C. Vazquez, A. Menchaca-Rocha, G. Boella, M. J. Boschini, M. Gervasi, D. Grandi, D. Pedrini, S. Pensotti, P.G. Rancoita, L. Rossi, G. Volpini, J. Bolmont, A. Jacholkowska, M. Sapinski, C. Zurbach, E. Chumilov, Yu. Galaktionov, V. Plyaskin, A. Suvorov, I. Mitrofanov, N. Chernoplekov, A. Grechko, S. Vostrikov, G. Bashindzhagyan, M. Merkin, M. Panasyuk, J. Gong, G. Q. Gu, J. Q. Li , Q. Li , J. Z. Luo, Q. Meng, L. G. Shuai, H. Yi, C. R. Zou, A. Chikanian, E. Finch, R. Majka, J. Sandweiss, B. Alpat, G. Ambrosi, A. Damiamo, A. Piluso, R. Battiston, B. Bertucci, S. Bizzaglia, S. Blasko, W. J. Burger, D. Caraffini, C. Cecchi, G. Esposito, E. Fiandrini, E. Fiori, G. Lamanna, M. Menichelli, M. Pauluzzi, P. Zuccon, A. Papi, M. Bizzarri, L. Di Massso, G. Scolieri, S. Qiu, F. Cervelli, St. Di Falco, St. Galeotti, F. Gherarducci, M. Incagli, T. Lomtadze, C. Magazzù, A. Orsini, E. Pedreschi, M. Piendibene, F. Pilo, F. Spinella, C. Vannini, F. Bracciaferri , M. Conte, S. Di Pippo, A. Agneni, St. Baccaro, A. Bartoloni, B. Borgia, C. Bosio, C. Gargiulo, S. Gentile, M. Montecchi, A. Paolozzi, P. Rapagnani, E. Valente, J. Yang, K. Kim, W. J. Ding, A. Z. Gu, Z. J. Jin, W. S. Lin, Q. J. Pang, W. X. Qiao, J. H. Shi, Y. M. Shi, R. S. Wang, S. W. Xie, Q. H. Ye, E. Falchini, P. Maestro, P.S. Marrocchesi, Y. C. Chao, C. E. Lin, S. C. Lee, Y. Lei, Z. Ren, C. Wan, Y. Zhou, R.H. O'Neal, Jr., R. J. Garcia Lopez, C. Delgado, A. Monfardini, P. Trampus, T. Eronen, T. Laitinen, E. Riihonen, J. Torsti, E. Valtonen, H. Anderhub, A. Biland, B. Blau, H. Hofer, H. Horvath, F. Pauss, J. Ulbricht, G. Viertel, “AMS on ISS: Application of particle physics technology to manned interplanetary flight -the AMS Collaboration,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods Research Section A, March 2005, URL: http://ams.cern.ch/AMS/ETB/Appendix%20A-AMSonISS_Technology_Applications_Interplanetary.pdf
7) “AMS-02 Command And Data Handling Interface Control Document,” Revision 05m, Dec. 10, 2004, URL: http://ams.cern.ch/AMS/Electronics/Docs/AMS-02_Command_And_Data_Handling_ICD_Rev_05m.pdf
8) “Payload Integration Agreement for Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer-02 (AMS-02),” March 2006, URL: http://ams-02project.jsc.nasa.gov/Documents/SSP57113.pdf
10) T. Krynicki, “The Cosmic Radiation Detector (AMS-02) on the International Space Station,” Proceedings of IAC 2004, Vancouver, Canada, Oct. 4-8, 2004, IAC-04-IAF-Q.P.11
13) “Memorandum of Understanding For Collaboration in the Integration, Testing and Operation of the AMS Experiment between the Participating Institutions/Funding Agencies,” July 5, 2008, URL: http://ams.cern.ch/AMS/Reports/TIMJuly05/08_AMS_MoU_27July05.pdf
14) Roberto Battiston on behalf of the AMS collaboration, “The Alpha Magne,c Spectrometer (AMS) Experiment,” 54th UN-COPOUS (United Nations Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space), Vienna, Austria, June 1-10, 2011, URL: http://www.oosa.unvienna.org/pdf/pres/copuos2011/tech-23.pdf
15) “In Search of Antimatter Galaxies,” Aug. 14, 2009, URL: http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2009/14aug_ams.htm?list1291671
16) Michael Braukus, “Heads of Agency International Space Station Joint Statement,” NASA, March 11, 2010, Release: 10-063, URL: http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2010/mar/HQ_10-063_HOA_statement.html
18) “Endeavour blasts off on next-to-last shuttle flight,” Space Daily, May 16, 2011, URL: http://www.space-travel.com/reports/Endeavour_blasts_off_on_next-to-last_shuttle_flight_999.html
22) STS-134 Press Kit, NASA, April 2011, URL: http://www.nasa.gov/pdf/538352main_sts134_presskit_508.pdf
25) Samuel C. C. Ting, “The Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer on the International Space Station,” 33rd ICRC (International Cosmic Ray Conference), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, July 2-9, 2013, URL: http://188.8.131.52/indico/getFile.py/access?contribId=1259&sessionId=2&resId=0&materialId=slides&confId=0
26) “New results from AMS presented at ICRC 2013,” July 8, 2013, URL: http://www.ams02.org/2013/07/new-results-from-ams-presented-at-icrc-2013/
27) “First result from the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer Experiment,” AMS Collaboration Press Release, April 3, 2013, URL: http://www.ams02.org/2013/04/first-results-from-the-alpha-magnetic-spectrometer-ams-experiment/
28) “First Findings from Station's State-of-the-Art Particle Physics Detector,” NASA, April 3, 2013, URL: http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/research/ams.html
29) “Shining light on elusive dark matter,” ESA, April 3, 2013, URL: http://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Human_Spaceflight/DAMA_mission/Shining_light_on_elusive_dark_matter
30) Tony Phillips, “A whiff of dark matter on the ISS,” NASA, April 15, 2013, URL: http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2013/14apr_ams/
31) “Happy first year in space to AMS,” AMS-02, May 19. 2012, URL: http://www.ams02.org/2012/05/happy-first-year-in-space-to-ams/
32) Stefan Schael, “The Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer Experiment on ISS — An endeavor for a Global Research Collaboration,” ISS Symposium 2012 'Research in space for the benefit of humankind,' Berlin, Germany, May 2-4, 2012, URL: http://blogs.esa.int/iss-symposium2012/files/2012/05/SCHAEL_02_MAY_1630-web210.pdf
33) “AMS-02, ” April 2, 2012, URL: http://www.ams02.org/2012/04/welcome-to-the-edoardo-amaldi-atv-3/
34) “Happily Collecting from the CERN POCC,” AMS-02 team, June 25, 2011, URL: http://www.ams02.org/2011/06/happily-collecting-data-from-the-cern-pocc/
35) “Endeavour Lands, Atlantis at Launch Pad,” NASA, June 1, 2011, URL: http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/shuttle/main/index.html
38) Jessica Nimon, “A Timeline to Launch for the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer,” NASA, May 19, 2011, URL: http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/research/news/ams.html
41) Jorge Casaus, “The AMS-02 experiment on the ISS,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 171, 2009, 012045, doi:10.1088/1742-6596/171/1/012045
42) Paolo Zuccon, “The AMS-02 experiment on the ISS: status and perspectives,” Proceedings of the 31st ICRC (International Cosmic Ray Conference), Lodz, Poland, July 7-15, 2009, URL: http://www.srl.utu.fi/AuxDOC/kocharov/ICRC2009/pdf/icrc1273.pdf
43) Engineering and Science Contracts Group, “Test Plan for the Static and Modal Tests of the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer 02 (AMS-02),” NASA, Oct. 2006, ESCG-4460-06-LODY-TP-0206, URL: http://ams-02project.jsc.nasa.gov/Documents/AMS-02%20Static-Modal%20Test%20Plan.pdf
44) Roberto Battiston, “The Anti Matter Spectrometer (AMS-02): a Particle Physics Detector In Space,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 116, 2008, 012001, doi:10.1088/1742-6596/116/1/012001
47) Philip von Doetinchem, Michael Griffin, “AMS-02 Anticounter,” August 2007, URL: http://www1b.physik.rwth-aachen.de/~kolleg/fileadmin/data/gk/de/badhonnef/2007/vonDoetinchem.pdf
48) Simonetta Gentile on behalf of AMS-02 collaboration, “Detection and measurement of gamma rays with the AMS-02 detector,” ECRS06 (20th European Cosmic Ray Symposium), Lisbon, Portugal, Sept. 2006, URL: http://www.lip.pt/events/2006/ecrs/proc/ecrs06-s5-117.pdf
49) Alessandro Monfardini, Paolo Trampus, Roberto Battiston, Corrado Gargiulo, “AMICA, an astro-mapper for AMS,” URL: http://arxiv.org/ftp/astro-ph/papers/0506/0506377.pdf
50) C. Gargiulo, “AMICA Star Tracker Support,” July 25, 2005, URL: http://ams.cern.ch/AMS/Tracker/Meetings/20050720/Gargiulo_StarTracker.pdf
51) M. Menichelli, G. Ambrosi, R. Battiston, M. Bizzarri, S. Blasko, D. Cosson, E. M. Fiori, O. Maris, A. Papi, G. Scolieri, “The Power Supply System of the AMS-02 Tracker Detector,” IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, Vol. 53, Issue 4, Aug. 2006, ISSN: 0018-9499
52) Roberto Battiston, “AMS-02 Experiment, sub-detector: Silicon Tracker,” AMS-02 Phase II Flight Safety Review, Houston, TX, May 21-25, 2007, URL: http://ams.cern.ch/AMS/Reports/TIMApr07/Wed25/SRII_TRACKER_25MAY07.ppt
53) Ph. von Doetinchem, Th. Kirn, K. Lübelsmeyer, St. Schael, “The Anticoincidence Counter System of AMS-02,” Proceedings of the 31st ICRC (International Cosmic Ray Conference), Lodz, Poland, July 7-15, 2009, URL: http://www.srl.utu.fi/AuxDOC/kocharov/ICRC2009/pdf/icrc1064.pdf
54) Stefan Schael, “AMS-02: Anti-Coincidence-Counter,” 2007, URL: http://accms04.physik.rwth-aachen.de/~schael/AMS_Talks_files/07-Schael-Veto-klein.pdf
55) W. Wallraff, “AMS-02 Anti Coincidence Counter,” October 26, 2005, AMS-TIM Geneva, URL: http://ams.cern.ch/AMS/Reports/TIMOct05/TOF/03_ACC_Wallraff.ppt
56) Ph. von Doetinchem, W. Karpinski, Th. Kirn, K. Lübelsmeyer, St. Schael, M. Wlochal, “The AMS-02 Anticoincidence Counter,” Nov. 2008, URL: http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0811/0811.4314v1.pdf
57) Luisa Arruda, Fernando Barao, Patricia Goncalves, Rui Pereira, “The Ring Imaging Cherenkov detector of the AMS experiment: test beam results with a prototype,” 2006, URL: http://www.lip.pt/~amswww/ScienceActivity/lip.papers/RICH.LIP.Proceed.2006.IPRD.LuisaArruda.pdf
58) Luisa Arruda, “The Ring Imaging Cherenkov detector of the AMS experiment: test beam results with a prototype,” IPRD06 (10th Topical Seminar on Innovative Particle and Radiation Detectors), Siena, Italy, Oct. 1-5, 2006, URL: http://www.bo.infn.it/sminiato/sm06/paper/061002m/arruda.pdf
59) R. Kossakowski, F. Cadoux, V. Chambert-Hermel, G. Coignet, J. M. Dubois, D. Fougeron N. Fouque, L. Girard, C. Goy, R. Hermel, B. Lieunard, S. Rosier-Lees, J. P. Vialle, G. Chen, H. Chen, Z. Liu, Y. Lu, Z. Yu, H. Zhuang, F. Cervelli, S. Di Falco, T. Lomtadze, G. Venanzoni, E. Falchini, P. Maestro, P. S. Marrocchesi, R. Paolietti, F. Pilo, N. Turini, G. Valle, “Electromagnetic calorimeter for the AMS-02 experiment,” CALOR 2002, Pasadena, CA, USA, March 25-29, 2002, URL: http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/02/51/69/PDF/democrite-00021556.pdf
60) Catherine Adloff, “Performance of a 3D Imaging Electromagnetic Calorimeter for the AMS-02 Experiment,” CALOR (11th International Conference on Calorimetry in High Energy Physics) 2004, Perugia, Italy, April 2, 2004, URL: http://www.pg.infn.it/calor2004/program/pres/friday_afternoon/adloff.pdf
61) F. Cadoux, F. Cervelli, G. Coignet, G. Cougolat, S. Di Falco, C. Goy, R. Hermel, R. Kossakowski, M. Incagli, Z. H. M. Li, Y. S. Lu, C. Magazzu, E. Pedreschi, M. Piendibene, F. Pilo, J. Pochon, S. Rosier-Lees, F. Spinella, C. Vannini, J. P. Vialle, “The Electromagnetic Calorimeter Trigger System for the AMS-02 Experiment,” IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, Vol. 55, Issue 2, April 2008, pp. 817-821
62) Jan Olzem, “Construction of the AMS-02 Transition Radiation Detector for the International Space Station- The AMS-02 TRD Collaboration,” The 29th International Cosmic Ray Conference, ICRC05 , Pune, India, Aug. 3-10, 2005, URL: http://ams.cern.ch/AMS/Talks/Olzem_ICRC05_poster.pdf
63) Mike Schanau, “The performance of the AMS-02 transisition radiation detector, 2005, The 29th International Cosmic Ray Conference, ICRCOS, Pune, India, Aug. 3, 2005, URL: http://ams.cern.ch/AMS/Talks/Schmanau_ICRC05.ppt
64) Joseph Burger, Simonetta Gentile on behalf of the AMS-02 transition radiation detector (TRD), Group, “The AMS-02 TRD for the International Space Station,” 28th International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC2003), Tsukuba, Japan, July 31-Aug. 7, 2003
65) Florian Hauler, A. Bartoloni, U. Becker, P. Berges, B. Borgia, J. Burger, C. H. Chung, W. de Boer, F. Dömmecke, P. Fischer, S. Fopp, S. Gentile, R. Henning, L. Jungermann, W. Karpinski, Th. Kirn, A. Kounine, V. Koutsenko, K. Lübelsmeyer, B. Monreal, S. Schael, M. Schmanau, K. Scholberg, G. Schwering, T. Siedenburg, W. Wallraff, M. Wlochal, “The AMS-02 TRD for the International Space Station,” URL: http://www.roma1.infn.it/exp/ams/pubblicazioni_romani/FH1.pdf
66) Chanhoon Chung, Thorsten Siedenburgy on behalf of the AMS-02 Collaboration, “The AMS-02 Transition Radiation Detector,” Proceedings of the 31st ICRC (International Cosmic Ray Conference), Lodz, Poland, July 7-15, 2009, URL: http://www.srl.utu.fi/AuxDOC/kocharov/ICRC2009/pdf/icrc1264.pdf
67) Roberto Battiston, “The Anti Matter Spectrometer (AMS-02): a Particle Physics Detector In Space,” Proceedings of the International Workshop 'Advances in Cosmic Ray Science,' Journal of the Physics Society of Japan, Vol. 78, 2009, Supplement A, pp. 74-77, URL: http://jpsj.ipap.jp/link?JPSJS/78SA/74/pdf
69) “AMS-02 testing delivers decisive result,” ESA, June 29, 2010, URL: http://www.esa.int/SPECIALS/Space_Engineering/SEMDRPOZVAG_0.html
70) “AMS-02 Magnets Comparison,” http://www.ams02.org/what-is-ams/tecnology/magnets-comparison/
71) Chris Tutt, “Permanent Magnet Impacts to STS/ISS/MOD,” May 5, 2010, URL: http://ams-02project.jsc.nasa.gov/life_cycle/Delta_CDR_May2010/Presentations/Impacts_to_ISS,STSS,and_MOD-Chris_Tutt.pptx
72) “The Permanent Magnet,” URL: http://www.ams02.org/what-is-ams/tecnology/magnet/pmmagnet/
73) “THE LAST TEST BEAM @ CERN,” August 17, 2010, URL: http://www.ams02.org/2010/08/the-last-test-beam-cern/
75) Project Technical Requirements Specification for the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer-02 (AMS-02), Payload Integration Hardware (PIH),” JSC 29789, Revision A, Aug. 17, 2004, URL: http://ams-02project.jsc.nasa.gov/Documents/JSC29789.pdf
76) “Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer-02 (AMS-02) Software Interface Control Document,” NASA/JSC, SSP 57391, March 2008, URL: http://ams-02project.jsc.nasa.gov/Documents/SSP57391.pdf
77) M. Capell, E. Cortina, for the AMS-02 Collaboration, “AMS-02 Electronics,” The 28th International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC2003), Tsukuba, Japan, July 31-Aug. 7, 2003
79) M. Boschini, X. Cai, M. Capell, J. Casaus, V. Choutko, A. Eline, “AMS-02 POCC and SOC: Implementation Plan,” AMS Note 2008-10-01, October 27, 2008, URL: http://ams.cern.ch/AMS/Reports/AMSnotes2008/AMSnote-2008_10_01.pdf
The information compiled and edited in this article was provided by Herbert J. Kramer from his documentation of: ”Observation of the Earth and Its Environment: Survey of Missions and Sensors” (Springer Verlag) as well as many other sources after the publication of the 4th edition in 2002. - Comments and corrections to this article are always welcome for further updates.