Minimize AIM

AIM (Aeronomy of Ice in the Mesosphere)

AIM is a minisatellite mission within NASA's SMEX (Small Explorer) program designed to provide frequent, low-cost access to space for a variety of missions (the AIM mission was selected in July 2002 with final approval in May 2004). The objective of AIM is to study the causes of Earth's highest-altitude clouds, which occur on the very edge of space. These clouds, referred to as PMCs (Polar Mesospheric Clouds), form in the coldest part of the atmosphere, about 50-90 km above the polar regions, every summer.

PMCs are of special interest as they are sensitive to both global change and solar/terrestrial influences (study of the coupling between the heliosphere and the Earth's atmosphere). Recorded sightings of these silvery-blue, noctilucent or ”night-shining” clouds (NLCs) were first reported in 1885 at high latitudes. They have been increasing in frequency and extending to lower latitudes over the past four decades. They are called ”night shining” clouds by observers on the ground because their high altitude allows them to continue reflecting sunlight after the sun has set below the horizon.

The AIM mission will observe PMCs in their thermal, chemical and dynamic environment in which they form in order to determine the connection between PMCs and the meteorology. Specific parameters of the polar mesosphere to be measured are: PMC abundances, spatial distribution, particle size distributions, gravity wave activity, cosmic dust influx to the atmosphere and precise, vertical profile measurements of temperature, H2O, OH, CH4, O3, CO2, NO, and aerosols. The results from this mission will provide the basis for study of long-term variability in the mesospheric climate.

AIM_Auto15

Figure 1: Artist's view of the AIM spacecraft in orbit to observe noctilucent clouds (image credit: Emily Hill Design)

AIM is a NASA PI (Principal Investigator) mission, lead by James M. Russell III of Hampton University (HU), Hampton, VA. The AIM team, led by HU, is made up of members from varies partner organizations (universities and institutions). In this setup, Hampton University is the prime contractor to NASA and manages all programmatic aspects of the project. LASP (Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics) of the University of Colorado at Boulder is a major subcontractor to AIM, providing two instruments and the functions of mission operations and data acquisition. AIM data will be analyzed and prepared for public archiving by Hampton University with the assistance of GATS (Gordley &Associates Technical Software) Inc. of Newport News, VA. Further partners in AIM are: UAF (University of Alaska, Fairbanks), USU/SDL (Utah State University / Space Dynamics Laboratory), GMU (George Mason University), and BAS (British Arctic Survey). 1) 2) 3)

AIM_Auto14

Figure 2: Illustration of the AIM spacecraft (image credit: OSC, CAS/HU)

Spacecraft:

OSC (Orbital Sciences Corporation) of Dulles, VA, is the prime contractor to CAS/HU (Center for Atmospheric Sciences/Hampton University) for the spacecraft and payload integration. The AIM mission employs the LeoStar-2 bus of OSC, a 3-axis stabilized zero momentum platform. The spacecraft structure (hexagonal bus) has a diameter of 1.09 m and a length of 1.4 m. S/C power = 335 W (orbital average) using a fixed GaAs solar array; spacecraft mass of ~ 200 kg, design life of at least 2 years. 4) 5)

The spacecraft uses an aluminum honeycomb bus structure, with a deployed solar array wing canted at 50º. The solar array uses high efficiency solar cells on composite substrates, and the full array is assembled from 6 solar panel sections, and wrapped around the spacecraft (cells facing out) during launch. The panels are sequentially deployed into a flat panel and then canted away from the spacecraft body. The array provides 300 W of average power. The instruments SOFIE and CIPS are mounted to the nadir panel of the hexagonal structure, and CDE is mounted to the zenith panel. Instrument electronics for SOFIE are housed within the spacecraft body.

AIM_Auto13

Figure 3: The cylindrical bus structure of AIM (image credit: NASA)

Attitude control is accomplished using 3 reaction wheels and 3 torque rods. The C&DH system employs a RAD 6000 computer (BAE). The ACS system uses a star tracker, gyro, magnetometer and sun sensors.

The spacecraft is inertially pointed during SOFIE observations, and nadir oriented with pitch and roll offsets to obtain the common volume CIPS observations. The spacecraft performs a subsolar yaw maneuver to keep the arrays sunlit over the daylight side of the orbit.

AIM_Auto12

Figure 4: The AIM spacecraft with solar arrays in stowed configuration (image credit: NASA)

AIM_Auto11

Figure 5: Photo of the AIM spacecraft with the solar array fully deployed (image credit OSC)

Legend to Figure 5: There are six separate solar array panels, which are integrated into a single deployed wing. In this orientation the nadir deck is pointed up towards the ceiling, and the SOFIE and CIPS instruments are visible in the photo. The photograph was taken in the clean room at the Orbital Sciences, Dulles, Va. facility.

 

Launch: An air launch of AIM on the Pegasus-XL launch vehicle of OSC took place on April 25, 2007 (air launch from an L1011 aircraft near the launch site: VAFB, CA, USA). 6)

Orbit: Sun-synchronous circular orbit, altitude = 600 km, inclination = 97.78º, LTAN = 12 hours.

RF communications: An S-band link is chosen via NASA's space/ground network and TDRS (Tracking and Data Relay Satellite) system. Communication is done through two helix antennas using an L-3 CXS-600B transceiver with S-band uplink and two downlink transmit capabilities for compatibility with the 2 Msample/s transmit rate to the ground network (GN), and the 2 ksample/s rate to TDRS.

AIM_Auto10

Figure 6: Alternate view of the deployed AIM spacecraft (image credit: OSC)

 


 

Mission status:

• January 2014: The AIM spacecraft continues to perform nominally in its 7th year on orbit. The project received funding to operate through September 2018 (Ref. 9).

• June 2013: Every summer, something strange and wonderful happens high above the north pole. Ice crystals begin to cling to the smoky remains of meteors, forming electric-blue clouds with tendrils that ripple hypnotically against the sunset sky. This year, NLCs (Noctilucent Clouds) are getting an early start. NASA's AIM spacecraft started seeing them on May 13. 7)

The early start is extra-puzzling because of the solar cycle. Researchers have long known that NLCs tend to peak during solar minimum and bottom-out during solar maximum—a fairly strong anti-correlation.

• On April 25, 2013, the AIM spacecraft was 6 years on-orbit. AIM continues to operate nominally. A lunar eclipse occurred on May 10 , 2013 but the coarse sun sensors remained locked on the sun and therefore had no impact on the spacecraft operations (Ref. 8).

• January 2013: The AIM spacecraft continues to perform nominally. The subsystems remain healthy and functional. 8)

- AIM is currently funded to operate through September 2013. The project submitted a proposal to the NASA Senior Review process for continued operations through 2018. That proposal is in review with a decision expected in June, 2013. 9)

• August 2012: A key ingredient of Earth's strangest clouds does not come from Earth. New data from NASA's AIM spacecraft shows that "meteor smoke" is essential to the formation of NLCs (Noctilucent Clouds). Using data from the SOFIE (Solar Occultation for Ice Experiment), the project found that about 3% of each ice crystal in a noctilucent cloud is of meteoritic origin. 10)

The inner solar system is littered with meteoroids of all shapes and sizes — from asteroid-sized chunks of rock to microscopic specks of dust. Every day Earth scoops up tons of the material, mostly the small stuff. When meteoroids hit our atmosphere and burn up, they leave behind a haze of tiny particles suspended 70 km to 100 km above Earth's surface.

In the 19th century, NLCs were confined to high latitudes—places like Canada and Scandinavia. In recent times, however, they have been spotted as far south as Colorado, Utah and Nebraska. The reason, James Russell (PI of AIM mission) believes, is climate change. One of the greenhouse gases that has become more abundant in Earth's atmosphere since the 19th century is methane (CH4). It comes from landfills, natural gas and petroleum systems, agricultural activities, and coal mining.

When methane makes its way into the upper atmosphere, it is oxidized by a complex series of reactions to form water vapor. This extra water vapor is then available to grow ice crystals for NLCs.

AIM_AutoF

Figure 7: The graphic shows how methane, a greenhouse gas, boosts the abundance of water at the top of Earth's atmosphere. This water freezes around "meteor smoke" to form icy noctilucent clouds (image credit: Hampton University, NASA)

• Status of July 20, 2012: All of the AIM spacecraft subsystems continue to perform well (Ref. 12). During the last period of bitlock on May 23, the project loaded several products to improve three areas of the spacecraft's performance.

AIM_AutoE

Figure 8: Astronauts on board the ISS took this picture of noctilucent clouds near the top of Earth's atmosphere on July 13, 2012 Image credit: HU, NASA)

• The AIM spacecraft and its instruments are operating nominally (except for a command workaround) in 2012 - in its 5th year on orbit. The AIM mission has been extended by NASA through the end of FY12.

• The AIM spacecraft and its instruments are operating nominally in 2011 (Ref. 1).

AIM_AutoD

Figure 9: Noctilucent clouds over Edmonton, Canada observed on July 20, 2011 (image credit: NASA) 11)

• The AIM spacecraft and its instruments are operating nominally in 2010. The AIM mission has been extended by NASA through the end of FY12. 12) 13)

• For the first time scientists have a comprehensive data set showing the formation and seasonal variation of the clouds over both poles. The mission is providing high quality data on cloud nucleus particle size, size variation with altitude, particle shape and its altitude dependence, and other characteristics that describe the onset and end of the PMC season. In addition scientists are observing the interplay between particles, water vapor and temperature variations, brightness variability over the entire polar cap region, and space and time variability. 14)

All AIM spacecraft systems have been functioning nominally since launch - except for the command receiver. The receiver has had periods of intermittent command signal rejection, but the AIM Flight Operations team has been able to successfully work around these difficulties. 15)

• The autonomous operations concept for AIM has evolved over its first year on orbit. On May 20, 2008, AIM has been selected for extended mission funding following the 2-year Explorer baseline mission. The extension from June 2009 through September 2012 will allow tracking the evolution of mesospheric clouds for an additional seven seasons and provide data to address key outstanding questions including: 16)

- Are there variations in PMCs that can be explained by changes in solar irradiance and particle input?

- What changes in mesospheric properties are responsible for north/south differences in PMC features?

- What controls interannual variability in PMC season duration and latitudinal extent?

- What is the mechanism of teleconnection between winter temperatures and summer hemisphere PMCs?

- What is the global occurrence rate of gravity waves outside the PMC domain?

• Routine science data processing started in February 2008. All data products are available to the public via the internet at the main AIM web page (Ref. 15).

• As of December 2007, AIM has provided the first global-scale view of the clouds over the entire 2007 Northern Hemisphere season with an unprecedented horizontal resolution of 5 km x 5 km. 17)

• Full science operations began on May 22, 2007. In June 2007, the AIM instruments captured the first images of noctilucent clouds over the Arctic region. 18)

• The commissioning of the spacecraft proceeded nominally through attaining normal pointing mode. Nine days after launch, the satellite started to have problems locking on the command uplink subcarrier modulation. This was the beginning of the intermittent operation of the transceiver that has continued ever since. Over the next couple of weeks many different uplink configurations were tested to characterize the performance of the receiver. 19)

The initial efforts focused on providing a system that was robust against extended command outages without making significant changes to the risk posture of the program. Once that had been accomplished, the priority shifted to developing and testing groundbreaking techniques for the command and control of a deaf satellite. These enhancements are being used to ensure AIM continues to collect great science data on the mysterious clouds that appear on the edge of space.

AIM_AutoC

Figure 10: One of the first ground sightings of noctilucent clouds in the 2007 season over Budapest, Hungary on June 15, 2007 (image credit: NASA)

AIM_AutoB

Figure 11: Noctilucent clouds over the Arctic region as seen by the AIM instruments (image credit: NASA)

 


 

Sensor complement: (CIPS, CDE, SOFIE)

The sensor complement consists of three instruments. Initially, the mission was planned with 4 instruments, but SHIMMER (Spatial Heterodyne Imager for Mesospheric Radicals) of NRL was deleted due to budgetary problems.

Instrument

Mass (kg)

Orbit average power (W)

Downlink data volume (Mbit/day)

Size(L x W x H)
(cm)

Active cooling

CIPS

24

35

1000

73 x 40 x78

 

CDE

2

5

< 1

50 x 34 x 5

 

SOFIE

38

40

200

58 x 44 x 70

16 TECs, 208-260K

Spacecraft bus

133

163

400

309 x 154 x 133

 

Total

197

243

1600.6

 

 

Table 1: Overview of instrument mass, power, data rate and dimensions

The instrument mass values (Table 1) include the electronic boxes. The bus size includes the solar arrays in deployed configuration.

 

CIPS (Cloud Imaging and Particle Size):

CIPS is an instrument designed and developed at CU/LASP (University of Colorado / Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics), Boulder, CO. The objective of CIPS is to take imagery of the clouds to determine when and where they form, and to document what they look like. 20) 21)

AIM_AutoA

Figure 12: Illustration of CIPS (image credit: CAS/HU)

CIPS images the PMC cloud deck with a resolution of 2 km, and measures the scattering phase function of PMCs along with other microphysical properties such as particle size and water content. The instrument consists of four wide angle cameras with a combined FOV (Field of View) of 80º x 120º. The camera FOV is centered about nadir providing an image size of 1440 km x 960 km at an altitude of 83 km. The clouds are imaged at the UV bandpass of 265 nm (±5 nm), taking advantage of the strong absorption characteristic of ozone at this wavelength to enhance the contrast of the cloud scattering with respect to the background Rayleigh scattering. 22) 23)

Each camera has an overlapping FOV and a pixel size at the nadir of ~2 km. The FOV of the camera system is 80º-120º, centered at the sub-satellite point, with the 120º axis along the orbit track as shown in Figure 13.

AIM_Auto9

Figure 13: CIPS FOV projected to 83 km; the satellite velocity vector direction is to the right (image credit: LASP, Ref. 15)

CIPS is a panoramic UV (narrow bandwidth with a center at 265 nm) nadir-pointing imager. Each of the cameras has a custom-designed 9 element lens system (Lakin Optical Systems) and a narrow bandpass optical filter from Barr Associates. The UV cloud image is focused onto the CsTe photocathode on a Hamamatsu image intensifier (converting UV to visible) that is fiber coupled to an Atmel CCD. An instrument microprocessor stores and processes all camera images for transmission to the spacecraft (Ref. 14).

The combination of images from the four cameras is referred to as a scene. CIPS records scenes of atmospheric and cloud radiance in the summer hemisphere from the terminator to ~40º latitude along the sunlit portion of the orbit. The near-polar orbit and cross-track FOV will cause the observation swaths to overlap at latitudes higher than about 70º, so that nearly the entire polar cap will be mapped daily by the 15-orbit per day coverage. In the nominal pointing mode, the CIPS images extend poleward to about 85º latitude in each hemisphere (Ref. 15).

Each camera has a focal ratio of 1.12, a focal length of 28 mm, a 25 mm lens diameter and includes an interference filter and a CCD (Charge Coupled Device) detector system. The throughput of the optical elements and their sizes are designed for a 71% measurement precision of the background sunlit Earth. The custom UV filters were manufactured by Barr associates and centered at 265 nm. The CCD detectors are coupled with Hamamatsu V5181U-03 image intensifiers (40 mm diameter active area) and have 2048 x 2048 useful pixels that are electronically binned in 4 x 8 combinations for an effective 340 (cross track) x 170 (along track) pixel images. The signal in each pixel is digitized to12 bit resolution. On average, 26 images are produced per orbit in the summer polar region with special ‘first light’ images just beyond the terminator.

Imaging is achieved with this body-fixed camera assembly using an exposure time of 1 s, which, when combined with the FOV, yields the nadir spatial resolution of ~2 km. Between four and seven exposures of the same cloud volume are made during a satellite overpass, at a rate of one scene every 46 s. Each CCD is equipped with a DSP (Digital Signal Processing) interface that incorporates a lossless Huffman compression algorithm, reducing data volume by about a factor of two. Therefore ,each scene produces 523kB of data yielding approximately 18 MB per orbit.

AIM_Auto8

Figure 14: Schematic view of a single CIPS camera and its elements (image credit: LASP)

AIM_Auto7

Figure 15: Photo of the CIPS camera assembly (image credit: CU/LASP, Ref. 15)

 

CDE (Cosmic Dust Experiment):

CDE is an in-situ dust detector designed and developed at LASP. CDE is mounted on the zenith side of the spacecraft, providing a very wide field of view and looking away from the Earth. The objective is to measure the influx of dust particles into the upper atmosphere, the PMC (Polar Mesospheric Cloud) region.

CDE is a copy of the SDC (Student Dust Counter) developed for the New Horizons spacecraft of NASA (launch Jan. 19, 2006), that is now traveling to Pluto and the Kuiper Belt (Pluto flyby in 2015).

Both CDE and SDC comprise an array of impact detectors made from polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF). PVDF is an electrically polarizable material. When physically impacted by a high speed particle, a small change in the polarization takes place, and that depolarization signal can be sensed as a change in electrical charge by fast analog electronics. Both particle mass and velocity contribute to the signal.

To minimize redesign in the CDE effort, the CIPS instrument electronics provide the interface to the CDE instrument, and the CIPS electronics were designed to mimic the New Horizons spacecraft interface. The AIM payload originally included an instrument platform assembly (IPA) as an integrating structure that would have permitted the instruments to be assembled and tested as a suite, and then installed on the spacecraft as a complete unit.

AIM_Auto6

Figure 16: Illustration of the CDE device (image credit: CAS/HU)

CDE observations integrated over several days are expected to show the temporal variability of the cosmic dust influx that could influence the formation of PMCs. The cosmic dust delivered to the mesosphere is most likely ablated to particle radii of ~0.2 nm, which coagulate to PMC nucleation sites of ~1 nm. Recent results from global-scale models reveal that variations in the influx of meteoric material can dramatically affect the availability of nucleation sites in the polar summer mesosphere. Although the availability of nucleation sites depends strongly on equator-ward transport from the polar summer mesosphere, large uncertainties exist in the models regarding total influx of material, the initial radius of the dust and the coagulation efficiency. The temporal variability of meteoric material measured by CDE will be used with observed variations in PMCs and model studies to assess the role that extraterrestrial forcing plays in PMC formation and variability. Such studies will involve sorting out other sources of variability of ice properties, and thus will probably require several PMC seasons to build up an adequate database.

AIM_Auto5

Figure 17: CDE sensors mounted on the top of the spacecraft (image credit: LASP)

Legend to Figure 17: Each patch of the 12 active PVDF sensors has a surface area of about 85 cm2. The panel is mounted to point towards the local zenith direction at all times, minimizing the impact rates from orbital debris.

The CDE goal to measure an expected impact rate of ≥ 100 hits/week requires a mass threshold of ≤ 4 x 10-12 g and a total sensitive surface area of ≥ 0.1 m2. To meet this requirement CDE (Figure 17) consists of 12 active PVDF patches with surface areas of 85 cm2 each. In addition,there are two other sensors (identical to the front side patches), on the back side of CDE that cannot be hit by dust. These reference detectors are being used to measure the noise background. The CDE dynamic range provides mass resolutions within a factor of ≤ 3 in the mass range of 4 x10-12 g ≤ m ≤ 4 x 10-9 g covering an approximate size range in particle radius of 0.8 µm ≤ a ≤ 8 µm.

Each of the 14 sensors has an adjustable threshold to optimize CDE operations. To follow the possible degradation of its performance due to ageing, CDE has onboard calibration capabilities for its electronics. Internal signals can be injected in each of the 14 channels with amplitudes covering its entire dynamical range. Each dust hit generates a science event, where the time, channel number and the impact charge are recorded, in addition to all relevant housekeeping data. Using appropriate averages this can be turned in to a time-dependent global map to show the possible spatial and temporal variability of the amount of cosmic dust entering the atmosphere.

 

SOFIE (Solar Occultation For Ice Experiment):

The SOFIE instrument is designed and developed at USU/SDL (Utah State University / Space Dynamics Laboratory) at Logan, UT. SOFIE is of SABER (Sounding of the Atmosphere using Broadband Emission Radiometry) heritage flown on TIMED (launch Dec. 7, 2001). The objective of SOFIE is to observe the following atmospheric constituents by the use of the solar occultation technique: temperature, PMCs, carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitric oxide (NO), ozone (O3) and aerosols.

SOFIE is an 8-channel differential absorption radiometer covering the spectral range from 290 nm (UV) to 5.26 µm (MWIR). Six channels are designed to measure gaseous signals, and two are dedicated to particle measurements. Measurements in two carbon dioxide bands are being used to simultaneously retrieve profiles of temperature and the carbon dioxide mixing ratio. 24) 25) 26) 27)

Each SOFIE channel uses two detectors, one that samples a spectral region where the target gas is strongly absorbing, and one that samples a weakly absorbing region. Measuring the difference of these signals allows precise isolation of the target gas signal. Once the gaseous contribution is isolated, the remaining signals can be used to infer particle extinction, so that particle measurements will be obtained from every channel.

Radiation entering the SOFIE telescope passes through a field stop which defines the instantaneous field of view (FOV). The field stop provides an angular field of view of 1.8 arcmin vertical by 6.0 arcmin horizontal. The FOV dimensions at the tangent point are about 1.2 km vertical by 4.1 km horizontal.

Optics: SOFIE uses a cassegrain telescope with a 10.16 cm entrance pupil. An elliptical steering mirror (16.76 cm x 11.55 cm) directs the incoming beam onto a focusing mirror and then to a secondary mirror (Figure 18). The backside of the secondary mirror contains a pickoff mirror that directs a portion of the beam into the sun sensor module. The main beam passes through a field stop that determines the instantaneous field of view (IFOV). The field stop is 1.95 arcmin vertical x 4.74 arcmin horizontal, which is 1.50 km x 3.63 km when projected to the 83 km limb path tangent point. The beam is chopped at 1000 Hz using a tuning fork device, and directed into the CSM (Channel Separation Module) where the science measurements are accomplished.

AIM_Auto4

Figure 18: Block diagram of the optical system of SOFIE (image credit: USU/SDL, Hampton University)

AIM_Auto3

Figure 19: Illustration of the SOFIE instrument (image credit: USU/SDL and GATS Inc.)

Channel

Band

Target
species

Center wavelength (µm)

Band limits in cm-1 (filter width %) based on FWHM

Interfering species

1

 

1

O3 strong

0.292

34000-35000 (2.9%)

Rayleigh, PMC

2

O3 weak

0.330

30000-31000 (3.3%)

Rayleigh, PMC

2

3

Particle

0.867

11400-11800 (3.4%)

Rayleigh

4

Particle

1.037

9500-9900 (4.1%)

Rayleigh

3

5

H2O weak

2.46

4040-4120 (2.0%)

CO2, CH4, PMC

6

H2O strong

2.618

3800-3880 (2.1%)

CO2, CH4, PMC

4

7

CO2 strong

2.785

3580-3650 (2.0%)

H2O, PMC

8

CO2 weak

2.939

3370-3440 (2.1%)

H2O, PMC

5

9

Particle

3.064

3235-3300 (2.0%)

CO2, CH4

10

Particle

3.186

3100-3165 (2.1%)

CO2, CH4

6

11

CH4 strong

3.384

2940-3000 (2.2%)

H2O, O3, PMC

12

CH4 weak

3.479

2820-2880 (2.1%)

H2O, O3, PMC

7

13

CO2 strong

4.324

2250-2350 (4.3%)

CH4, PMC

14

CO2 weak

4.646

2110-2160 (2.3%)

H2O, PMC

8

15

NO weak

5.006

1980-2020 (2.0%)

O3, CO2, H2O, PMC

16

NO strong

5.316

1860-1900 (2.1%)

O3, CO2, H2O, PMC

Table 2: Band specification of SOFIE

The SOFIE instrument includes a solar tracking system with the ability to acquire the sun, track it through an occultation, and perform scans as required for various on-orbit calibration sequences. The pointing system consists of two principal components: the sun sensor and steering mirror.

• The sun sensor uses a radiation hardened focal plane array (FPA) image sensor with 1024 x 1024 pixels. The FPA field of view is 2.04º in azimuth and 2.025º in elevation. The FPA diodes are 15 µm in size and subtend roughly 7.14 arcsec at tangent. The sun sensor center wavelength is 705 nm with a bandwidth of ± 5 nm. Incoming light is dispersed by the sun sensor optics according to the Airy disc function.
The sun sensor performs two principal functions, 1) location of the sun and 2) directing or maintaining the boresight (FOV) at a desired location on the solar image.

• Pointing is accomplished using a steering mirror at the aperture entrance. The steering mirror provides ± 1.6º of rotation in both elevation and azimuth. Optical gain magnifies these angles by a factor of 2 in elevation and sqrt(2) in azimuth. As a result, the range of optical rotation provided by the mirror is 4.5º in azimuth by 6.4º in elevation. The steering mirror has a maximum slew rate of > 0.8º/s. The pointing resolution is better than 0.8 arcsec.

Signal conditioning electronics: Three measurements are accomplished for each channel, the weak and strong band radiometer signals (Vw and Vs) and the difference of these signals (ΔV). A block diagram of the SOFIE analog signal path from detector to digitization is illustrated in Figure 20. Output signals from the detector preamp undergo signal conditioning including synchronous rectification at 1000 Hz. SOFIE signals are digitized using a 14 bit converter operating in the range of ±3 V.

AIM_Auto2

Figure 20: Electrical block diagram for a SOFIE band pair detector; the two paths represent the strong and weak band signal chains (image credit: USU/SDL)

SOFIE measurement geometry: SOFIE provides spacecraft sunset measurements at latitudes between about65º and 85ºS and sunrise measurements at latitudes between about 65ºN and 85ºN. SOFIE observes 15 sunrise and 15sunset occultations per day,and consecutive sunrises or sunsets are separated by ~96 min in time or ~24º in longitude. The SOFIE FOV (Field of View)at the tangent point is ~1.5 km vertical by ~4.4 km horizontal. The SOFIE measurement suite,consisting of 16 radiometer and 8 difference signal measurements, is sampled at 20 Hz, which corresponds to a vertical distance of ~145 m in the atmosphere. The vertical resolution of 1.5 km combined with the ~3 km s-1 solar sink or rise rate sets the natural frequency of the data set at ~2 Hz,which is the rate at which the FOV vertical dimension is swept through the atmosphere.

SOFIE instrument performance: SOFIE performance was characterized in laboratory calibration studies before launch and detailed characterizations have been completed in orbit. Laboratory calibration sequences addressed important instrument characteristics including measurement background and noise, FOV, response linearity, relative spectral response,time response,absolute gain,and difference signal gain. Because the basic measurements are ratios of signals used to determine atmospheric transmissions, absolute radiometric calibration is not important,except to ensure that the exoatmospheric solar view generates signals near the upper limit of the data acquisition system. Performance of the SOFIE measurement and retrieval system in-orbit is excellent in all cases with noise levels at or below laboratory values. The retrieval precision and altitude range based on data analysis thus far are summarized in Table 3.

Retrieval

Measurement precision at 83 km (unless noted)

Altitude range (km)

T

0.2 K

40-95

O3

11 ppbv

55-95

H2O

70 ppbv

20-95

CH4

5 ppbv (70 km)

20-75

PMC extinction (radiometers)

5 x 10-8 km-1

Cloud altitude

Table 3: Retrieval characteristics of SOFIE

In all cases SOFIE performance meets or exceeds AIM science requirements. Note that SOFIE CO2 and NO retrievals are currently not operational, but will be available in future data versions.

AIM_Auto1

Figure 21: Photo of the SOFIE instrument (image credit: USU/SDL and GATS Inc.)

Item

Retrieval/product

Measurement/description

Altitude range (km)

1

Temperature

Ch. 4 difference & ch. 7 difference (simultaneous with CO2 VMR, item 5)

50 - 100

2

Temperature

Ch. 4 difference

25 - 100

3

Temperature

705 nm refraction angle determined from sun sensor data

1 - 50

4

Temperature merged

Merged profile

1 - 100

5

CO2 VMR (Volume Mixing Ratio)

Ch. 4 difference & ch. 7 difference
(simultaneous with temperature, item 1)

50 - 100

6

CO2 VMR

Ch. 7 difference

20 - 100

7

CO2 VMR

Ch. 4 difference

15 - 100

8

CO2 VMR, merged

Merged profile

15 - 100

9

Water vapor VMR

Ch. 3 difference

50 - 110

10

Water vapor VMR

Ch. 3, band 6 (strong band)

15 - 80

11

Water vapor VMR,merged

Merged profile

15 - 110

12

Methane VMR

Ch. 6 difference

40 - 95

13

Methane VMR

Ch. 6, band 11 (strong band)

15 - 60

14

Methane VMR, merged

Merged profile

15 - 95

15

Nitric oxide VMR

Ch. 8 difference

80 - 120

16

Ozone VMR

Ch. 1 difference

60 - 100

17

Ozone VMR

Ch. 1, band 1 (strong band)

50 - 95

18

Ozone VMR

Ch. 1, band 2 (weak band)

15 - 60

19

Ozone VMR, merged

Merged profile

15 - 100

20

Particle extinction, 0.328 µm

Ch. 1, band 2

15 - 90

21

Particle extinction, 0.862 µm

Ch. 2, band 3

15 - 90

22

Particle extinction, 1.03 µm

Cha. 2, band 4

15 - 90

23

Particle extinction, 0.862-1.03 µm

Ch. 2 difference

15 - 90

24

Particle extinction, 2.45 µm

Ch. 3, band 5

15 - 90

25

Particle extinction, 2.94 µm

Ch. 4, band 8

15 - 90

26

Particle extinction, 3.06 µm

Ch. 5, band 9

15 - 90

27

Particle extinction, 3.19 µm

Cha. 5, band 10

15 - 90

28

Particle extinction, 3.06-3.19 µm

Cha. 5 difference

15 - 90

29

Particle extinction, 3.51 µm

Cha. 6, band 12

15 - 90

30

Particle extinction, 4.63 µm

Cha. 7, band 14

15 - 90

31

Particle extinction, 4.98 µm

Cha. 8, band 15

15 - 90

Table 4: SOFIE retrievals and data products

AIM_Auto0

Figure 22: Temperature profile of the standard atmosphere (image credit: Emily Hill Design)


1) http://aim.hamptonu.edu/index.html

2) http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/archive/pdmp/AIM_DMP_V1_20050401.doc

3) James M. Russell III, “Aeronomy of Ice in the Mesosphere (AIM),” URL: http://www.nasa.gov/pdf/148797main_JMR_SWW_%20AGU_May2006.pdf

4) http://www.orbital.com/NewsInfo/Publications/AIM_Fact.pdf

5) http://aim.hamptonu.edu/press/graphics.html

6) “AIM Press Kit,” NASA, URL: http://www.gats-inc.com/AIM_Press_Kit.pdf

7) Tony Phillips, “Noctilucent Clouds get an early start,” NASA Science News, June 7, 2013, URL: http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2013/07jun_nlcs/

8) “AIM Mission status of January 13, 2013,” URL: http://aim.hamptonu.edu/mission/status.php

9) Information provided by James M. Russell III, Hampton University, PI of the AIM project.

10) Tony Phillips, “Meteor Smoke Makes Strange Clouds,” NASA, Aug. 7, 2012, URL: http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2012/07aug_meteorsmoke/

11) “Astronomy Picture of the Day,” URL: http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap110720.html

12) http://aim.hamptonu.edu/mission/status.html

13) A. Chandran, D. W. Rusch, A. W. Merkel, S. E. Palo, G. E. Thomas, M. J. Taylor, S. M. Bailey, J. M. Russell III, “Polar mesospheric cloud structures observed from the cloud imaging and particle size experiment on the Aeronomy of Ice in the Mesosphere spacecraft: Atmospheric gravity waves as drivers for longitudinal variability in polar mesospheric cloud occurrence,” Journal of Geophysical research, Vol. 115, D13102, doi:10.1029/2009JD013185 , 2010

14) Michael T. McGrath, “The Aeronomy of Ice in the Mesosphere Mission,” Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, MT, USA, March 7-14, 2009

15) James M. Russell III, Scott M. Bailey, Larry L. Gordley, David W. Rusch, Mihály Horányi, Mark E. Hervig, Gary E. Thomas, Cora E. Randall, David E. Siskind, Michael H. Stevens, Michael E. Summers, Michael J. Taylor, Christoph R. Englert, Patrick J. Espy, William E. McClintock, Aimee W. Merkel, “The Aeronomy of Ice in the Mesosphere(AIM)mission:Overview and early science results,” Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, Vol. 71, 2009, pp. 289-299, doi:10.1016/j.jastp.2008.08.011, URL: http://uap-www.nrl.navy.mil/uap/7641/publications/2008_JASTP_AIM_Mission.pdf

16) http://aim.hamptonu.edu/mission/index.html

17) “NASA Satellite Reveals Unprecedented View of Mysterious Night-Shining Clouds,” Dec. 12, 2007, URL: http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/aim/mystery_clouds.html

18) http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/aim/index.html

19) Debra A. McCabe, Sean M. Ryan, David C. Welch, John R. Fulmer, “AIM Autonomy Development – Long Term Care for a Deaf Spacecraft,” Proceedings of SpaceOps 2008 Conference, Heidelberg, Germany, May 16-18, 2008, AIAA 2008-3450

20) http://aim.hamptonu.edu/instrmt/cips.html

21) “Cloud Imaging and Particle Size (CIPS) Instrument Overview,” CU/LASP, May 10, 2010, URL: http://lasp.colorado.edu/aim/

22) D. W. Rush, G. E. Thomas, W. McClintock, J. M. Russell, S. Bailey, C. E. Randall, “The Cloud Imaging and Particle Size Experiment on AIM,” Proceedings of AGU Fall Meeting, SPA Aeronomy, San Francisco, CA, Dec. 13-17, 2004

23) W. E. McClintock, D. W. Rusch, G. E. Thomas,A. W. Merkel, M. R. Lankton, V. A. Drake, S. M. Bailey, J. M. Russell, “The cloud imaging and particle size experiment on the Aeronomy of Ice in the mesosphere mission: Instrument concept, design, calibration, and on-orbit performance,” Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, Volume 71, 2009, Issue 3-4, pp. 340-355

24) Larry L. Gordley, Mark E. Hervig, James M. Russell, Chad Fish, Gregory J. Paxton, John C. Burton, Martin J. McHugh, “Sounding the upper mesosphere using broadband solar occultation: The SOFIE experiment,” Proceedings of SPIE, Vol. 6297, 62970G, 2006, URL: http://gwest.gats-inc.com/sofie/documents/SOFIE_paper_SPIE_2006.pdf

25) http://aim.hamptonu.edu/instrmt/sofie.html

26) “Solar Occultation For Ice Experiment,” http://gwest.gats-inc.com/sofie/SOFIE_Home_Page.html

27) Mark Hervig, Larry Gordley, “The Solar Occultation for Ice Experiment SOFIE,” CEDAR meeting, Santa Fe, NM, USA, June 20, 2006, URL: http://gwest.gats-inc.com/sofie/documents/sofie_overview_cedar_jun_2006.ppt


The information compiled and edited in this article was provided by Herbert J. Kramer from his documentation of: ”Observation of the Earth and Its Environment: Survey of Missions and Sensors” (Springer Verlag) as well as many other sources after the publication of the 4th edition in 2002. - Comments and corrections to this article are always welcome for further updates.