Various techniques are used in the IQL system to allow
efficient processing. The five most important features are described here.
Raw data is band-pass filtered and re-sampled in both range
and azimuth before it is focused. This greatly reduces the amount of input
data and the size of the necessary filters thus improving the efficiency.
A sub-sampling factor of 2 is used in range and 8 in azimuth. Out of the
8 possible azimuth spectral bands (looks), 3 are discarded and 5 are processed
separately and then combined as independent spectral looks to reduce speckle
noise. The bands are chosen so as to include, firstly, the look centered
on the average Doppler centroid of the 2 passes and then the 4 looks which
are the nearest neighbours to this one.
In range, the different look angle between the 2 passes
creates a spectral shift between their spectra. The non-overlapping part
of the spectrum is filtered out and a look is taken so that it is centred
on the overlapping part. The other look, which usually does not contain
much information, is discarded.
(2) Co-registration
The IQL is basically processed in independent slices
which cover the full 100 km swath in range and are 30 km long in azimuth.
After the sub-sampling stage the raw data slices are focussed. The co-registration
parameters between the 2 passes are calculated by finding 2 pairs of corresponding
tie-points in the images made from the central look of the 2 passes. These
tie-points are found by looking at the cross correlation function of many
small patches (~8x8 pixels) in the 2 images and stopping as soon as soon
as there is reasonable confidence that good tie-points have been found.
Two pairs of tie-points are used to give the co-registration process both
a shift and a stretch capability. Various rules are employed to try and
ensure that reliable tie-points are chosen. However, there are still situations
when errors can occur in the co-registration process, for example in situations
where the processing strips correspond to water (or forest and thus with
no reasonable coherence patches) or where the terrain is unstable such
when there is moving ice.
Once the co-registration parameters have been established,
each complex focussed look of the first pass is re-sampled on to the corresponding
look of the second pass using small (~7 pixel) time domain filters. From
these co-registered complex images 3 basic outputs are produced: a coherently
averaged 5 look complex interferogram and two incoherently averaged 5 look
intensity images (one for each pass). From these 3 basic images a coherence
image is computed
(3) Coherence Calculation
Coherence is defined as;

where V1 is one of the complex
images and V2 is the complex conjugate of the other image. The equation
used for the coherence estimation is;

where the sums are over L=5
looks in frequency and N spatially adjacent pixels. In general, large values
of N will give poor spatial resolution but will help to reduce the zero
coherence bias and the speckle noise. A value of N=3x3 is the compromise
used in the IQL, which gives a zero coherence bias of approximately 0.21.
It should be noted that values of N greater than 1 also introduce a negative
bias for high phase slopes. This leads to an under-estimate of the coherence
in regions of high slope.
(4) Phase Calculation and Output
After the processing strips have been joined together,
taking account of the changes in SWST (sampling window start time) and
after the coherence has been calculated, the phase of the interferogram
is computed. The phase image is corrected for fringes due to the Earth's
ellipsoid by accurately propagating the input state-vectors and calculating
the induced phase. It has been found that using precise rather than restituted
state vectors gives a clear improvement in the ellipsoid correction.
At this stage the first output from the IQL processor is
saved on disk. This is the basic, lowest level, output from the IQL system
and comprises four slant range images; the coherence, phase, intensity
1 and intensity 2. These images have 1 byte per pixel and have a resolution
of 32 m in azimuth and 38 m in ground range. The ILU and IBP browse images,
discussed earlier, are produced from these basic slant-range images. As
well as the browse images, the IQL offers the possibility to produce the
coherence, phase and two intensity images in ground range with a chosen
pixel size. The colour browse images can also be produced at higher resolutions
than those shown on the "INSI" web page.
(5) Parallel Processing
An important part in the design of the IQL was the use
of parallel processing to increase efficiency. This consisted mainly of
the implementation of the IQL as many small programs, each with its own
specific task. These sub-programs are launched by a main program (when
required) and communicate with each other using shared memory and semaphores.
The decision exactly when to run which program on which CPU is decided
during run-time by the computer's operating system.
What Machines does the IQL Run on and How Fast is it?
The IQL is currently running on various Silicon Graphics
machines. Specifically:
An 8-CPU (R8000/R8010 70/90 MHz), 1792 MB ram, 30 GB
disk, IRIX v.6.2 Power Onyx. This can process raw data from 2 3000km long
passes on disk at a rate of ~ 1.5 minutes per 30km slice.
A 2-CPU R10000 Origin 200 with 768MB. This can process
raw data from 2 3000km long passes on disk at a rate of ~ 2.5 minutes per
30km slice.
Data ingestion is from SONY D1, DLT or Exabyte in various
formats and can be run independently from the processing.
Who Built the IQL system?
The IQL system has been developed by Advanced Computer
Systems based on an initial prototype designed at the Dipartimento di Elettronica,
Politecnico di Milano.
CONCLUSION
The ERS Interferometric Quick Look system developed at
ERSIN has provided a powerful tool for assessing the quality of the ERS
tandem archive over large areas of the world's surface. It has been found
that the mode of the coherence over non-forested areas is typically 0.7
for tandem data. This confirms the value of this dataset for DEM generation
and is also usually sufficient to allow forested surfaces to be separated
from other land classes with a high degree of confidence.
REFERENCES
[1] Antikidis E., O Arino, H Laur, A Arnaud, "ERS SAR Coherence
and ATSR Hot Spots: a Synergy for Mapping Deforested Areas. The Special
Case of the 1997 Fire Event in Indonesia. Second International Workshop
on "Retrieval of Bio- and Geo-Physical Parameters from SAR Data for Land
Applications", ESTEC 1998.

Figure 1: An ILU image over Paraguay
Keywords: ESA European
Space Agency - Agence spatiale europeenne,
observation de la terre, earth observation,
satellite remote sensing,
teledetection, geophysique, altimetrie, radar,
chimique atmospherique, geophysics, altimetry, radar,
atmospheric chemistry