ESA Earth Home Missions Data Products Resources Applications
    21-May-2012
EO Data Access
How to Apply
How to Access
Data archives
Services
Site Map
Frequently asked questions
Glossary
Credits
Terms of use
Contact us
Search


 
 
 

GOME Diffuser and Dark Signal Trends

Angelika Dehn adehn@esrin.esa.it
Claus Zehner czehner@esrin.esa.it
ESA-ESRIN, Via G. Galilei, 00044 Frascati, Italy

The analysis on the GOME diffuser plate stability and the detector array dark signal measurements has been updated for the period July 1995 - September 1999. During this 4.5 years timespan no significant changes of the diffuser plate could be detected. 'The analysis of the dark signal' measurements shows a linear increase of the leakage current - of about 13-14 % per year.

Introduction

The Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment (GOME) was launched on ERS-2 in April 1995 and has been continuously operational since then. It is a scanning nadir-viewing spectrometer, with its primary scientific objective being to retrieve total column ozone globally. A more detailed description of the instrument can be found in [1] . In common with previous instruments to measure total column ozone from space such as TOMS and SBUV, it measures the back-scattered radiance from the Earth's atmosphere and surface, and the solar irradiance which is viewed via a diffuser plate to provide a reference spectrum at comparable intensity. These diffuser plates have been found to be subject to degradation (see [2] for example) particularly when subject to shorter wavelength ultra-violet light, and efforts have been made to characterize this degradation for instruments such as SBUV/2, where the diffuser plate was exposed for a total of around 750 hours between 1979 and 1986. GOME has been designed with a cover for its diffuser plate in an attempt to minimise this degradation, with exposure usually being for a short time for one orbit each day to obtain a reference solar spectrum, and characterisation of any degradation is possible by means of the on-board Pt/Cr/Ne calibration lamp. In order to investigate the GOME diffuser degradation, and to see if the measures taken have reduced the effect, a first analysis was done in January 1997. The results and detailed description are presented in technical note [9]. Updates on the analysis were done for the time periods June 1995 to December 1997, and June 1995 to December 1998 (see technical notes [10], [11]). This document provides the update on the degradation analysis, using the monthly calibration data from June 1995 until September 1999 following the same algorithms as in [9].

Algorithm Descriptions

The detailed description of the algorithms used for the calculation of diffuser reflectivity and dark signal components can be found in [9].

Dark Current Analysis

The dark signal for GOME is defined as being comprised of two parts - a constant value of between 140 and 150 binary units (BU) which is the fixed pattern readout noise (FPRN) and a time dependent component of around 2 to 3 binary units per second which is the leakage current (LC).
Trends were calculated for both the FPRN and the LC, and for the noise on these measurements. The results are shown in Table 1 below and Figures 1 to 2.


Figure 1: Leakage Current


Figure 2: Fixed PatternReadout Noise

     
Ch.
FPRN
Noise
LC
Noise
1
-0.21
-1.01
+12.7
+29
2
+0.04
+0.84
+13.9
+49
3
-0.11
+0.46
+14.3
+39
4
-0.06
-0.09
+13.8
+22
Table 1: GOME Dark Signal Trends - % per year

Diffuser Reflectivity

The diffuser reflectivity is calculated as the ratio of calibration lamp measurements and the lamp measurements via the diffuser. The result of the analysis for the diffuser reflectivity can be seen in Figure 3. The data are dark signal corrected.


Figure 3: Diffuser Reflectivity (to be multiplied by 10 -4)

Results

Over a period of about 4.5 years, the following conclusions regarding trends in the GOME dark signal and diffuser reflectivity have been reached.
  • No significant change is seen in the fixed pattern readout noise
  • There is an increase of ~13-14% per year in leakage current for all detectors
  • No significant change is seen in the diffuser reflectivity in any channel
This analysis is performed within the PCS about every half year to monitor GOME in orbit instrument performance.

References

[1] : GOME User's Manual SP-1182
ESA Publications Division September 1995.

[2] : Report of the International Ozone Trends Panel
WMO Report No. 18 Vol. 1, §2.3.6 1988.

[3] : ERGO Software User's Manual
DOR-GO-QA-SUM Issue 1.0 12/12/1995

[4] : ERGO Design Document
DOR-GO-QA-DD Issue 2.0 12/12/1995

[5] : GOME Data QA - Specification of Instrument Parameters - S. Slijkhuis
SRON-GOME-QA-TN01 Issue 2/A 30/06/1995.

[6] : ERGO Test Report of Final S/W Delivery Dec-1995 - S. Slijkhuis
SRON-GOME-QA-TN04 Issue 1 09/02/1996.

[7] : Remote Sounding of Atmospheres by J.T. Houghton, F.W. Taylor and C.D. Rodgers
Cambridge University Press 1st Edition 1986.

[8] : Functional / Performance Test on GOME BBM - Olij, C. & Zoutman, A. E.
TPD-ERS-GO-MIR-11 Issue 2 1993

[9]: GOME Diffuser Reflectivity and Dark Signal Analysis - D. Pemberton
ERS2-GO-DDS-TN-001 Issue 1.0 1997

[10]: Long Term Monitoring of GOME Diffuser Reflectivity and Dark Signal Analysis- A. Dehn
ERS2-GO-DDS-TN-002 Issue 1.0 1998

[11]: Long Term Monitoring of GOME Diffuser Reflectivity and Dark Signal Analysis- A. Dehn
ERS2-GO-DDS-TN-003 Issue 1.0 22/03/1999


 

 

Appendix A

Monthly Calibration Data Sets

Calibration Sequence
Date
Days From Launch
Orbits (No.)
1
27 June 1995
67
965 - 967; 969 (4)
2
28 July 1995
98
1410 - 1413 (4)
3
28 August 1995
129
1854 - 1857 (4)
4
28 September 1995
160
2298 - 2301 (4)
5
28 October 1995
190
2726 - 2730 (5)
6
28 November 1995
221
3171 - 3174 (4)
7
28 December 1995
251
3600 - 3604 (5)
8
04 February 1996
289
4144 - 4148 (5)
9
28 Februrary 1996
313
4488 - 4491 (4)
10
13 March 1996
327
4684; 4687 (2)
11
26 March 1996
340
4874 - 4878 (5)
12
28 March 1996
342
4902; 4904 - 4906 (4)
13
28 April 1996
373
5347 - 5350 (4)
14
28 May 1996
403
5776 - 5780 (5)
15
28 June 1996
434
6220; 6221; 6223 (3)
16
28 July 1996
464
6649; 6650 (2)
17
28 August 1996
495
7092 - 7096 (5)
18
28 September 1996
526
7536 - 7540 (5)
19
06 November 1996
565
8094 - 8098 (5)
20
28 January 1997
648
9282 - 9286 (5)
21
28 Februrary 1997
679
9726 - 9730 (5)
22
28 March 1997
707
10129 - 10132 (4)
23
28 April 1997
738
10570 - 10574 (5)
24
28 May 1997
768
11000 - 11004 (5)
25
28 June 1997
799
11444 - 11448 (5)
26
28 July 1997
829
11874 - 11877 (4)
27
28 August 1997
860
12318 - 12322 (5)
28
28 September 1997
891
12760 - 12764 (5)
29
28 October 1997
921
13190 - 13194 (5)
30
28 November 1997
952
13634 - 13638 (5)
31
28 December 1997
972
14064 - 14068 (5)
32
28 January 1998
1003
14508 - 14512 (5)
33
28 Februrary 1998
1034
14950 - 14954 (5)
34
28 March 1998
1062
15352 - 15356 (5)
35
28 April 1998
1093
15796 - 15800 (5)
36
28 May 1998
1123
16224 - 16228 (5)
37
28 June 1998
1154
16668 - 16672 (5)
38
28 July 1998
1184
17098 - 17102 (5)
39
28 August 1998
1215
17542 - 17546 (5)
40
28 September 1998
1246
17986 - 17990 (5)
41
28 October 1998
1276
18416 - 18420 (5)
42
28 November 1998
1307
18858 - 18862 (5)
43
28 December 1998
1337
19288 - 19292 (5)
44
02 February 1999
1372
19804 - 19808 (5)
45
28 February 1999
1398
20176 - 20180 (5)
46
28 March 1999
1426
20576 - 20580 (5)
47
28 April 1999
1457
21020 - 21024 (5)
48
28 May 1999
1487
21450 - 21454 (5)
49
28 June 1999
1518
21894 - 21898 (5)
50
28 July 1999
1549
22322 - 22336 (5)
51
28 August 1999
1580
22768 - 22770 (3)
52
28 September 1999
1610 
23210 - 23214 (5)

Appendix B

Lamp Lines Used For Diffuser Calibration

Channel 1
Channel 2
Line Number
Wavelength/ nm
Pixel Number
Line Number
Wavelength/ nm
Pixel Number
1
244.08
313.79
1
321.91
275.71
2
248.79
353.41
2
332.47
368.00
3
262.88
475.23
3
337.92
415.96
4
266.02
503.16
4
352.15
542.43
5
273.48
569.93
5
369.53
698.64
6
281.03
638.76
6
372.82
728.42
7
283.11
657.69
7
390.99
893.48
8
293.06
749.28
8
392.03
903.05
9
299.88
812.66
10
304.35
854.03
11
306.56
874.64
Channel 3
Channel 4
Line Number
Wavelength/ nm
Pixel Number
Line Number
Wavelength/ nm
Pixel Number
1
425.55
145.6
1
588.35
44.42
2
427.60
155.2
2
594.65
72.22
3
429.09
162.2
3
597.72
85.92
4
437.25
200.6
4
603.17
109.43
5
460.20
309.8
5
607.60
130.53
6
492.36
464.5
6
609.79
140.45
7
503.92
520.3
7
613.01
155.21
8
540.21
694.7
8
616.53
171.30
9
556.43
772.0
9
621.90
196.02
10
574.99
859.4
10
626.82
218.84
11
576.60
866.8
11
630.65
236.66
12
580.61
885.5
12
638.47
273.25
13
582.18
892.7
13
653.47
344.13
14
588.35
921.3
14
660.08
375.64
15
594.65
950.4
15
668.01
413.61
16
597.72
964.1
16
693.14
534.83
17
603.17
988.6
17
717.59
653.62
18
607.60
1008.5
18
724.72
688.28
19
744.09
782.40
20
749.09
806.62
21
753.79
829.28

Keywords: ESA European Space Agency - Agence spatiale europeenne, observation de la terre, earth observation, satellite remote sensing, teledetection, geophysique, altimetrie, radar, chimique atmospherique, geophysics, altimetry, radar, atmospheric chemistry